From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: nfs tests
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:54:37 +0800
Message-ID: <53226F6D.4000503@intel.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1403131743040.316@cobra.newdream.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:16037 "EHLO mga09.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753563AbaCNCyj (ORCPT <rfc822;ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:54:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1403131743040.316@cobra.newdream.net>
Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org>
To: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org

On 03/14/2014 08:44 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> Hey Zheng,
> 
> What workloads have you been testing against NFS?
kernel build, fsstress, dbench, blogbench.

Regards
Yan, Zheng
Do you mind adding them 
> to the knfs tests in ceph-qa-suite?  I suggest we add anything that you 
> consider stable.
>
> Thanks!
> sage
>