[PATCH v3] net: phy: fix uninitalized WOL parameters in phy_ethtool_get_wol

[sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth)]

On 03/13/2014 08:38 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:02:55 +0100
>
>> phy_ethtool_get_wol is a helper to get current WOL settings from
>> a phy device. When using this helper on a PHY without .get_wol
>> callback, struct ethtool_wolinfo is never set-up correctly and
>> may contain misleading information about WOL status.
>>
>> To fix this, always zero relevant fields of struct ethtool_wolinfo
>> regardless of .get_wol callback availability.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>
> I'm starting to see this situation more clearly now, especially with
> Ben's most recent commentary.
>
> The basic notion is that one must do ethtool ops are designed such that
> the top-level execution context in net/core/ethtool.c takes care of
> initializing the structure.
>
> In this case, we're referring specifically to ethtool_get_wol(), which
> runs any time ETHTOOL_GWOL is requested.
>
> Therefore no ethtool_ops->get_wol() implementation should duplicate
> this work, that goes for all of such cases which invoke the function
> we are talking about here, phy_ethtool_get_wol().
>
> So the first change is definitely to remove:
>
> 	wol->supported = 0;
> 	wol->wolopts = 0;
>
> from:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c:mv643xx_eth_get_wol()
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c:cpsw_get_wol()
>
> Next, I think phy_suspend() must create the same environment the
> call sites above guarentee for phy_ethtool_get_wol(), namely
> by changing the declaration of 'wol' to:
>
> 	struct ethtool_wolinfo wol = { .cmd = ETHTOOL_GWOL };
>
> which will cause the compiler to clear out the rest of the structure
> for us, as the same declaration does in ethtool_get_wol().
>
> Finally, purge the spurious clears in phydev_ops->get_wol(), namely
> in at803x_get_wol() and m88e1318_get_wol().
>
> So, to reiterate, OPS never have to be mindful of initializing the
> ethtool result with zeros.  However, anyone who calls into OPS
> directly must provide said expected state.
>
> Are we all on the same page now?

Yes, we are. I'll send a fix for phy_suspend in a minute - still based
on v3.14-rc1 in case there will be another -rc.

If not, I'll rebase that fix on net-next together with patches for the
four offending drivers you named above.

Sebastian