All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs for-3.1.12 branch has been updated to 40c65a7
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:28:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53232019.8060701@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140219215025.GF4916@dastard>

On 02/19/2014 03:50 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
...
>
> Can you outline the testing you have done?
Sorry it took so long to get back.

I used Kernel version 3.14.0-rc4+
Compared the results against TOT xfsprogs and for-3.1.12

Most of the bugs were log and repair specific so I ran a bunch of tests 
to exercise those.

I ran xfstests several times on ia64, x86_64 and i386 with the following 
command:
./check -g auto -x dmapi -x freeze -x tape

generic/306     - output mismatch (see 
/usr/src/3.1.12/xfstests/results//generic/306.out.bad)
     --- tests/generic/306.out    2014-03-11 09:42:47.000000000 -0500
     +++ /usr/src/3.1.12/xfstests/results//generic/306.out.bad 
2014-03-11 11:34:01.000000000 -0500
     @@ -2,11 +2,9 @@
      == try to create new file
      touch: cannot touch 'SCRATCH_MNT/this_should_fail': Read-only file 
system
      == pwrite to null device
     -wrote 512/512 bytes at offset 0
     -XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)xfs/001 
     [not run] mkfs.xfs doesn't have crc feature
xfs/002     [not run] mkfs.xfs doesn't have crc feature
xfs/005     [not run] mkfs.xfs doesn't have crc feature
xfs/299     [not run] mkfs.xfs doesn't have crc feature
xfs/304     [not run] mkfs.xfs doesn't have crc feature
xfs/305     [not run] mkfs.xfs doesn't have crc feature
     +XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY: Inappropriate ioctl for device
      == pread from zero device
     ...
     (Run 'diff -u tests/generic/306.out 
/usr/src/3.1.12/xfstests/results//generic/306.out.bad'  to see the 
entire diff)


xfs/016     - output mismatch (see 
/usr/src/3.1.12/xfstests/resuxfs/lts//xfs/016.out.bad)
     --- tests/xfs/016.out    2014-03-11 09:42:47.000000000 -0500
     +++ /usr/src/3.1.12/xfstests/results//xfs/016.out.bad    2014-03-11 
11:34:15.000000000 -0500
     @@ -11,25 +11,30 @@
         *** mount
         *** fiddle
         *** unmount
     +XFS: Invalid block length (0x2000) given for buffer
      *** generate log traffic
         *** mount
         *** fiddle
     ...
     (Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/016.out 
/usr/src/3.1.12/xfstests/results//xfs/016.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)

xfs/122     - output mismatch (see 
/usr/src/3.1.12/xfstests/results//xfs/122.out.bad)
     --- tests/xfs/122.out    2014-03-11 09:42:47.000000000 -0500
     +++ /usr/src/3.1.12/xfstests/results//xfs/122.out.bad    2014-03-11 
11:34:17.000000000 -0500
     @@ -49,39 +49,70 @@
      sizeof( xfs_agfl_t ) = 4
      sizeof( xfs_agi_t ) = 296
      sizeof( xfs_alloc_rec_incore_t ) = 8
     +sizeof( xfs_alloc_rec_incore_t ) = 8
     +sizeof( xfs_alloc_rec_t ) = 8
      sizeof( xfs_alloc_rec_t ) = 8
      sizeof( xfs_attr_inactive_list_t ) = 8
     ...
     (Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/122.out 
/usr/src/3.1.12/xfstests/results//xfs/122.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)

      - output mismatch (see
/usr/src/3.1.12/xfstests/results//xfs/178.out.bad)
      --- tests/xfs/178.out    2014-03-11 09:42:47.000000000 -0500
      +++ /usr/src/3.1.12/xfstests/results//xfs/178.out.bad    2014-03-11
12:09:55.000000000 -0500
      @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@

       attempting to find secondary superblock...
       found candidate secondary superblock...
      +error reading superblock 1 -- seek to offset 1099511623680 failed
      +unable to verify superblock, continuing...
      +found candidate secondary superblock...
       verified secondary superblock...

Ran: generic/001 generic/002 generic/003 generic/005 generic/006 
generic/007 generic/010 generic/011 generic/013 generic/014 generic/015 
generic/020 generic/053 generic/062 generic/069 generic/070 generic/074 
generic/075 generic/076 generic/077 generic/079 generic/083 generic/088 
generic/089 generic/091 generic/100 generic/105 generic/112 generic/113 
generic/117 generic/120 generic/123 generic/124 generic/125 generic/126 
generic/127 generic/128 generic/129 generic/130 generic/131 generic/132 
generic/133 generic/135 generic/141 generic/169 generic/184 generic/192 
generic/193 generic/198 generic/204 generic/207 generic/208 generic/209 
generic/210 generic/211 generic/212 generic/213 generic/214 generic/215 
generic/219 generic/221 generic/223 generic/224 generic/225 generic/226 
generic/228 generic/230 generic/231 generic/232 generic/233 generic/234 
generic/235 generic/236 generic/237 generic/239 generic/240 generic/245 
generic/246 generic/247 generic/248 generic/249 generic/255 generic/256 
generic/257 generic/258 generic/263 generic/269 generic/270 generic/273 
generic/274 generic/275 generic/277 generic/285 generic/286 generic/294 
generic/299 generic/300 generic/306 generic/307 generic/308 generic/309 
generic/310 generic/312 generic/313 generic/314 generic/315 generic/316 
generic/317 generic/318 generic/319 generic/320 shared/032 shared/051 
shared/218 shared/243 shared/298 xfs/003 xfs/004 xfs/008 xfs/009 xfs/012 
xfs/016 xfs/017 xfs/019 xfs/021 xfs/026 xfs/027 xfs/028 xfs/029 xfs/030 
xfs/031 xfs/033 xfs/034 xfs/041 xfs/042 xfs/045 xfs/046 xfs/047 xfs/048 
xfs/049 xfs/050 xfs/052 xfs/054 xfs/056 xfs/059 xfs/060 xfs/061 xfs/063 
xfs/064 xfs/065 xfs/066 xfs/067 xfs/071 xfs/072 xfs/073 xfs/078 xfs/084 
xfs/085 xfs/086 xfs/087 xfs/092 xfs/096 xfs/103 xfs/104 xfs/108 xfs/109 
xfs/110 xfs/116 xfs/118 xfs/121 xfs/122 xfs/134 xfs/137 xfs/138 xfs/139 
xfs/140 xfs/164 xfs/165 xfs/166 xfs/167 xfs/170 xfs/174 xfs/178 xfs/179 
xfs/180 xfs/181 xfs/182 xfs/183 xfs/186 xfs/187 xfs/188 xfs/189 xfs/190 
xfs/194 xfs/195 xfs/196 xfs/199 xfs/200 xfs/201 xfs/202 xfs/203 xfs/205 
xfs/206 xfs/216 xfs/217 xfs/220 xfs/222 xfs/227 xfs/229 xfs/238 xfs/242 
xfs/244 xfs/250 xfs/252 xfs/253 xfs/259 xfs/261 xfs/262 xfs/266 xfs/278 
xfs/281 xfs/282 xfs/283 xfs/287 xfs/290 xfs/291 xfs/292 xfs/293 xfs/295 
xfs/296 xfs/298 xfs/301 xfs/302 xfs/303 xfs/306
Not run: generic/093 generic/097 generic/099 generic/241 generic/260 
generic/288 generic/311 generic/321 generic/322 shared/001 shared/002 
shared/003 shared/004 shared/005 shared/272 shared/289 xfs/001 xfs/002 
xfs/005 xfs/040 xfs/044 xfs/057 xfs/058 xfs/090 xfs/094 xfs/095 xfs/148 
xfs/149 xfs/177 xfs/191 xfs/197 xfs/279 xfs/299 xfs/300 xfs/304 xfs/305
Failures: generic/306 xfs/016 xfs/122 xfs/178
Failed 4 of 235 tests

There were some tests that did not run that were crc specific
xfs/001     [not run] mkfs.xfs doesn't have crc feature
xfs/002     [not run] mkfs.xfs doesn't have crc feature
xfs/005     [not run] mkfs.xfs doesn't have crc feature
xfs/299     [not run] mkfs.xfs doesn't have crc feature
xfs/304     [not run] mkfs.xfs doesn't have crc feature
xfs/305     [not run] mkfs.xfs doesn't have crc feature

generic/306
There is on patch that could be cherry-picked to fix it. (I re-ran tests 
with it applied.

commit fcd6fa7f6a29188a756ff8b071a152bc9d62baf4
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Oct 8 15:17:50 2013 +0000

     xfsprogs: restrict platform_test_xfs_fd to regular files

xfs/016 passes
If I revert bb4074a31 xfstests: use minimum log size in xfs/016
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-10/msg00559.html

xfs/122 also fails on both and most people don't install INDENT so they 
would never see it.

xfs/178
This test blows away the main sb, then does repair. It should have found 
sb1 but failed, it did find sb2. strange but not an error. I got the 
same error using TOT xfsprogs.

Thanks
--Rich

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-14 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-20 17:22 xfsprogs 3.1.12 and 3.2.0 releases? Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2014-01-20 22:30 ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-20 22:42   ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2014-01-20 23:02     ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-20 23:08       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-20 23:11         ` Ben Myers
2014-01-21  8:17           ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2014-01-21 23:41             ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-22 14:38               ` Mark Tinguely
2014-01-22 14:54                 ` Mark Tinguely
2014-01-22 14:48               ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2014-01-22 23:03                 ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-23 22:37                   ` Rich Johnston
2014-01-21  8:22           ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-27 18:46 ` [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs for-3.1.12 branch has been updated to 40c65a7 Rich Johnston
2014-01-28  4:20   ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-28 15:36     ` Rich Johnston
2014-01-28 16:54       ` Ben Myers
2014-01-28 20:17       ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-28  4:42   ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-28 15:33     ` Rich Johnston
2014-01-28 20:15       ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-28 17:29     ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2014-01-30 19:20       ` Rich Johnston
2014-01-30 20:20         ` Eric Sandeen
2014-01-30 20:58           ` Rich Johnston
2014-02-19 19:18   ` Rich Johnston
2014-02-19 21:50     ` Dave Chinner
2014-03-14 15:28       ` Rich Johnston [this message]
2014-04-07 18:20 ` xfsprogs 3.1.12 and 3.2.0 releases? Rich Johnston
2014-04-07 23:30   ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-08 12:38     ` Rich Johnston

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53232019.8060701@sgi.com \
    --to=rjohnston@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.