From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172] helo=ns3.lanforge.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WOZlS-0001gu-Tf for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 21:35:39 +0000 Message-ID: <53237602.2080404@candelatech.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:34:58 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Performance of ath10k References: <005b01cf3f6b$6c6c4840$4544d8c0$@innovelec.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <005b01cf3f6b$6c6c4840$4544d8c0$@innovelec.co.uk> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Trevor Cullen Cc: 'Vu Hai NGUYEN' , 'Kalle Valo' , ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 03/14/2014 02:54 AM, Trevor Cullen wrote: > There's much debate going on in my circles about this card. It's based on > the QCA XB140 reference design which supposedly supports 11a,b,g,n, ac at > 2.4G or 5G (not concurrent). > > So does ath10k support this card fully? The WLE900VX appears to work as well as the CUS223, at least. I have not tried any other ath10k NICs yet..but will order some when vendors start making them available... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k