From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 5/6] Samsung PM updates for v3.15 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:09:54 +0100 Message-ID: <53273A72.2080402@samsung.com> References: <8259832.260591393840570438.JavaMail.weblogic@epml16> <20140309183523.GD22881@quad.lixom.net> <531CFA28.9020600@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:62755 "EHLO mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755535AbaCQSKA (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:10:00 -0400 Received: from eucpsbgm2.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.245]) by mailout1.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0N2L00GY1EGL6500@mailout1.w1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:09:57 +0000 (GMT) In-reply-to: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Turquette Cc: Olof Johansson , Tomasz Figa , Kukjin Kim , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "arm@kernel.org" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "khilman@linaro.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Hi Mike, On 10.03.2014 01:08, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> On 09.03.2014 19:35, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:56:11AM +0000, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>> >>>> The following changes since commit >>>> 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72: >>>> >>>> Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800) >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git >>>> tags/samsung-pm-1 >>>> >>>> for you to fetch changes up to e11d919e4aa2009077e3e4f829ff991d37adca61: >>>> >>>> ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code (2014-02-14 >>>> 08:16:01 +0900) >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll >>> hold >>> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect >>> they'll be >>> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. >> >> >> I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK my >> own patches. ;) >> >> Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: >> >> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa > > Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :) > > I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the > other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said, > these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit. May we get your ACK for this? I hope it's not too late already to have them merged for 3.15. Best regards, Tomasz From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:09:54 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL 5/6] Samsung PM updates for v3.15 In-Reply-To: References: <8259832.260591393840570438.JavaMail.weblogic@epml16> <20140309183523.GD22881@quad.lixom.net> <531CFA28.9020600@gmail.com> Message-ID: <53273A72.2080402@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Mike, On 10.03.2014 01:08, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> On 09.03.2014 19:35, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:56:11AM +0000, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>> >>>> The following changes since commit >>>> 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72: >>>> >>>> Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800) >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git >>>> tags/samsung-pm-1 >>>> >>>> for you to fetch changes up to e11d919e4aa2009077e3e4f829ff991d37adca61: >>>> >>>> ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code (2014-02-14 >>>> 08:16:01 +0900) >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll >>> hold >>> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect >>> they'll be >>> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though. >> >> >> I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK my >> own patches. ;) >> >> Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches: >> >> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa > > Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :) > > I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the > other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said, > these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit. May we get your ACK for this? I hope it's not too late already to have them merged for 3.15. Best regards, Tomasz