From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: gf-complete contributions Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:04:26 +0100 Message-ID: <5327FE0A.9050305@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OI2NLmSm2jp8TFfeukEeaum2tl1fmcrGP" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([91.121.254.229]:46522 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752001AbaCRIEc (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Mar 2014 04:04:32 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "James S. Plank" Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --OI2NLmSm2jp8TFfeukEeaum2tl1fmcrGP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jim, As of today jerasure 2 and gf-complete are used in the development versio= n of ceph :-) https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1384 There are a few pull requests to gf-complete here: https://bitbucket.org/jimplank/gf-complete/pull-requests Should they be changed so they can be merged ? Cheers --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --OI2NLmSm2jp8TFfeukEeaum2tl1fmcrGP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlMn/goACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22PIACglLRXi1HHYNktgEwj+58VOP0x 6W4AoKM3tEhpqBSO1thaTCEGyE47ORdT =qfkO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OI2NLmSm2jp8TFfeukEeaum2tl1fmcrGP--