From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Alexander Holler <holler-SXC+2es9fhnfWeYVQQPykw@public.gmane.org>,
Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org"
<davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>,
Alexandre Courbot
<gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Grant Likely
<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: davinci: fix gpio selection for OF
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:24:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <532825D9.4050708@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <532815A8.9090807-SXC+2es9fhnfWeYVQQPykw@public.gmane.org>
Hi Alexander,
On Tuesday 18 March 2014 03:15 PM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 18.03.2014 09:37, schrieb Sekhar Nori:
>
>> It is safe - at the least it does not break anything that is already
>> working. I guess the decision to put it into -rc depends on whether you
>> consider out of tree dtbs to be a valid usecase for the kernel.
>
> That's all DT is about, getting rid of the necessity for in-tree
> hw-descriptions. ;)
>
> But I don't need any rush here, I'm just unable to understand why the
> -rc phase isn't used for bug fixing as I believe that's what this phase
> is for.
The push back you are seeing is because this is pretty late in -rc
cycle. If this push back was not there the bug fix cycle would probably
never close.
In all probability, if this was -rc2 or even -rc3 there would not be so
much discussion.
Thanks,
Sekhar
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] gpio: davinci: fix gpio selection for OF
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:24:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <532825D9.4050708@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <532815A8.9090807@ahsoftware.de>
Hi Alexander,
On Tuesday 18 March 2014 03:15 PM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 18.03.2014 09:37, schrieb Sekhar Nori:
>
>> It is safe - at the least it does not break anything that is already
>> working. I guess the decision to put it into -rc depends on whether you
>> consider out of tree dtbs to be a valid usecase for the kernel.
>
> That's all DT is about, getting rid of the necessity for in-tree
> hw-descriptions. ;)
>
> But I don't need any rush here, I'm just unable to understand why the
> -rc phase isn't used for bug fixing as I believe that's what this phase
> is for.
The push back you are seeing is because this is pretty late in -rc
cycle. If this push back was not there the bug fix cycle would probably
never close.
In all probability, if this was -rc2 or even -rc3 there would not be so
much discussion.
Thanks,
Sekhar
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
To: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: davinci: fix gpio selection for OF
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:24:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <532825D9.4050708@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <532815A8.9090807@ahsoftware.de>
Hi Alexander,
On Tuesday 18 March 2014 03:15 PM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 18.03.2014 09:37, schrieb Sekhar Nori:
>
>> It is safe - at the least it does not break anything that is already
>> working. I guess the decision to put it into -rc depends on whether you
>> consider out of tree dtbs to be a valid usecase for the kernel.
>
> That's all DT is about, getting rid of the necessity for in-tree
> hw-descriptions. ;)
>
> But I don't need any rush here, I'm just unable to understand why the
> -rc phase isn't used for bug fixing as I believe that's what this phase
> is for.
The push back you are seeing is because this is pretty late in -rc
cycle. If this push back was not there the bug fix cycle would probably
never close.
In all probability, if this was -rc2 or even -rc3 there would not be so
much discussion.
Thanks,
Sekhar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-18 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5315ED51.1000006@ti.com>
[not found] ` <5315ED51.1000006-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-04 22:06 ` [PATCH] gpio: davinci: fix gpio selection for OF Alexander Holler
2014-03-04 22:06 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-04 22:06 ` Alexander Holler
[not found] ` <1393970762-5346-1-git-send-email-holler-SXC+2es9fhnfWeYVQQPykw@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-05 2:27 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-05 2:27 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-05 2:27 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-05 10:43 ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-03-05 10:43 ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-03-05 10:43 ` Grygorii Strashko
[not found] ` <5316FFCE.1060603-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-05 11:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexander Holler
2014-03-05 11:21 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-05 11:21 ` Alexander Holler
[not found] ` <1394018461-757-1-git-send-email-holler-SXC+2es9fhnfWeYVQQPykw@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-05 13:12 ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-03-05 13:12 ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-03-05 13:12 ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-03-11 10:15 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-11 10:15 ` Linus Walleij
[not found] ` <CACRpkdaF=jc9Z1XZCtH8VPuih01t--qyV-sgH1R_ix0VM4RzVA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-14 10:08 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-14 10:08 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-14 10:08 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-14 11:02 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-14 11:02 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-14 12:38 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-14 12:38 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-14 13:54 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-14 13:54 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-14 18:33 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-14 18:33 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-14 19:52 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-14 19:52 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-15 7:37 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-15 7:37 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-17 13:29 ` Sekhar Nori
2014-03-17 13:29 ` Sekhar Nori
2014-03-17 13:29 ` Sekhar Nori
2014-03-17 14:05 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-17 14:05 ` Linus Walleij
[not found] ` <CACRpkdYZMzw31NkA4uSq+ZowzOnZgZthXhZri-eJY2Ozb8aNRQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-18 8:37 ` Sekhar Nori
2014-03-18 8:37 ` Sekhar Nori
2014-03-18 8:37 ` Sekhar Nori
[not found] ` <532805AE.9000806-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-18 9:45 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-18 9:45 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-18 9:45 ` Alexander Holler
[not found] ` <532815A8.9090807-SXC+2es9fhnfWeYVQQPykw@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-18 10:54 ` Sekhar Nori [this message]
2014-03-18 10:54 ` Sekhar Nori
2014-03-18 10:54 ` Sekhar Nori
2014-03-21 8:28 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-21 8:28 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-21 8:28 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-21 8:59 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-21 8:59 ` Alexander Holler
[not found] ` <5326F8C5.5090406-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-17 14:11 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-17 14:11 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-17 14:11 ` Alexander Holler
2014-03-17 14:13 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-17 14:13 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-17 15:04 ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-03-17 15:04 ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-03-17 15:04 ` Grygorii Strashko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=532825D9.4050708@ti.com \
--to=nsekhar-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=holler-SXC+2es9fhnfWeYVQQPykw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.