All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mfuzzey@parkeon.com (Martin Fuzzey)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Deadlock with I2C based clock providers
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:26:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5328499D.4040806@parkeon.com> (raw)

Hi Mike,

I have a clock provide that implements the clock operations over i2c.

Although this is now possible since commit 533ddeb1e8 clk: allow 
reentrant calls into the clk framework

that patch only deals with single threaded reentrancy.


The issue I am having involves two threads:

Thread A calls the i2c clock driver
Thread B is in an unrelated driver for another I2C device on the same 
I2C bus (audio codec).


Thread A:
     clk_set_rate(my_clk)
         clk_prepare_lock()  <== Takes clock lock
         clk_change_rate()
             ops->set_rate()
                 i2c_transfer()
                     i2c_lock_adapter()  <== Blocks on I2C bus lock



Thread B:
     i2c_transfer()
         i2c_lock_adapter()    <== Takes I2C bus lock
         i2c_imx_xfer()
             i2c_imx_start()
                 clk_prepare_enable(i2c_clk)
                     clk_prepare_lock()  <== Blocks on clock lock


The problem is that the locks are taken in the reverse order leading to 
a classic deadlock.

I saw your [RFC] clk: reentrancy via per-clock locking but that seemed 
to have other problems.


My current (horrible) workaround involves exposing clk_prepare_lock() 
and calling it from i2c_core but that obviously isn't the right solution.

Regards,

Martin

             reply	other threads:[~2014-03-18 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-18 13:26 Martin Fuzzey [this message]
2014-03-18 23:29 ` Deadlock with I2C based clock providers Mike Turquette

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5328499D.4040806@parkeon.com \
    --to=mfuzzey@parkeon.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.