From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: Opening Xen 4.4.1-pre for backports Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:46:01 +0000 Message-ID: <53284E19.7010103@citrix.com> References: <21283.4717.55024.515678@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20140317180259.GQ3200@reaktio.net> <53282B450200007800125122@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20140318130425.GR3200@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WPuLG-0007iA-10 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:46:10 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20140318130425.GR3200@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Ian Jackson , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 18/03/14 13:04, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:17:25AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 17.03.14 at 19:02, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 02:30:05PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: >>>> I have updated xen/Makefile's version number. I take it we should be >>>> considering backport requests to apply to 4.4, where applicable, now ? >>>> >>> I'd like to see at least the following backported to Xen 4.4.1: >>> >>> - pygrub fixes (rhel7 beta support) >>> - qemu-upstream hvm vcpu hotplug patches (actually these seem to be alr= eady in = >>> qemu-upstream-4.4) >>> - RTC fixes (win2k3 crash fix) >> I guess you mean 4c15a82f, c7e35c6e, and 6d27a537 here. I'm not >> sure I want to copy them over that quickly. >> > Yep. I recall these were discussed during the 4.4-rc cycle and the though= t was = > the RTC fixes would first go to master, and then after 4.4.0 release get = backported to 4.4.1. = > Whatever timing is good.. = For what it is worth, these patches have been running in XenServer from around the time they were presented on the list, and we have had no problems at all with them. (In fairness, they had specifically fixed the identified regressions as part of being posted.) ~Andrew