Re: [meta-filesystems] [PATCH] Add fusermount to fuse by default

[George Nita <george.nita@enea.com>]

On 03/21/2014 01:15 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> George Nita schreef op 21-03-14 10:38:
>> On 03/21/2014 11:07 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: George Nita schreef op 21-03-14
>> 08:23:
>>>>> Without fusermount the '/etc/init.d/fuse status' command exits
>>>>> with error. Added fusermount to PACKAGES list and ensured it gets
>>>>> installed.
>>
>> How are you ensuring it gets installed? You only added a new packages,
>> you haven't updated any R* variable to take the new package into
>> account.
>>
>>> By installing fusermount into ${base_bindir}
>
> So what you're saying is that /bin/fusermount ends up in 'fuse-utils' and
> you're just adding 'fusermount' to PACKAGES because it looks cool? I get
> that you want to have /bin/fusermount installed on your system, but I don't
> get what your patch is doing.
You're right, no need to add 'fusermount' to PACKAGES.
However, in order to get fusermount in the image root file system:
- add installation lines in code as in my patch or similar
- delete the 2 lines that assign to FILES_fuse-utils and 
FILES_fuse-utils-dbg
- something else (what ?)

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>
> iD8DBQFTLB9GMkyGM64RGpERAn6/AJ4oqRW3F4Y+bXvOuAg9sUQEZGIGJgCcCeSj
> BDhkv5mcw4UZjB56C5zJmso=
> =a1Ip
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>


-- 
Best regards,
George Nita