From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:51920 "EHLO mail-ee0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761099AbaCURYX (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:24:23 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c13so2093951eek.9 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:24:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Athlon64X2-5000.site (ip-178-201-166-250.unitymediagroup.de. [178.201.166.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 48sm12932327eee.2.2014.03.21.10.24.21 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:24:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <532C75F8.2030405@googlemail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 18:25:12 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Frank_Sch=E4fer?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: xc2038/3028 firmware Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, are there any reasons why the xc2028/3028 firmware files are not included in the linux-firmware tree ? The xc5000 firmware is already there, so it seems Xceive|has nothing against| redistribution of their firmware... ?! Regards, Frank