All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: John Heffner <johnwheffner@gmail.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TCP being hoodwinked into spurious retransmissions by lack of timestamps?
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:53:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <532CB4D0.50403@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABrhC0=hHpZSdE5-dLqysuFn_d_VK7r1jKb0kGZF9hn1+UHjDw@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/03/2014 07:22 PM, John Heffner wrote:
> Running with such a large window scale and no timestamps (PAWS
> protection) is generally not a great idea, but I don't think is part
> of the issue here.
>
> If you look where things really go wrong, the receiver is sending
> anomalous SACK blocks that will trigger the SACK renege handling path.
>   Reneging triggers go-back-n behavior, so we see the spurious
> retransmits from there on.

What triggers go-back-n when SACK is not in use?  I ask because at least 
once I have seen the same sort of thing without SACK enabled on the 
connection.  The total quantity of retransmissions is roughly the same, 
but spread-out - looks like cwnd shrinks considerably and re-grows in 
the no-SACK case.  Not sure I still have that trace though :(

rick jones

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-21 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-04  0:29 TCP being hoodwinked into spurious retransmissions by lack of timestamps? Rick Jones
2014-03-04  3:22 ` John Heffner
2014-03-04 18:50   ` Rick Jones
2014-03-04 19:14     ` John Heffner
2014-03-04 19:33       ` Rick Jones
2014-03-04 20:35         ` Neal Cardwell
2014-03-04 21:56           ` Rick Jones
2014-03-04 22:23           ` Yuchung Cheng
2014-03-04 23:14             ` Rick Jones
2014-03-21 21:53   ` Rick Jones [this message]
2014-03-25 17:39 ` Rick Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=532CB4D0.50403@hp.com \
    --to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=johnwheffner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.