All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] eal_common_cpuflags: Fix %rbx corruption, and simplify the code
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:47:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533099FB.5030702@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140324195206.GG19368-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org>

On 03/24/2014 12:52 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>>
> To add an extra sanity check in rte_get_flag_enabled.  If we were moving to the
> use of C99 initalizers, I wanted something to catch the possibility that we skip
> a flag by accident (i.e. leave a zero initalized hole in the array).  Except 0
> from my read is a valid value for all the fields of the array.  So I bumped up
> the cpuid register enum by one and wrapped it in a macro.  That way we can test
> for !feat->reg as an indicator that we're requesting feature support for a flag
> thats not listed in the array.

It actually isn't: there aren't any flags in CPUID leaf 0, so since the
code only looks for bits it'd be perfectly okay to reject leaf 0.

Another thing that I noted is that the code doesn't actually check that
any particular leaf is valid (by checking the maximum leaf number in
CPUID leaf 0xXXXX0000:EAX).  Especially for the leaf 7 features this
could result in false positives, which obviously would be disastrous.

	-hpa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-24 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1395330830-1310-1-git-send-email-hpa@linux.intel.com>
     [not found] ` <1395330830-1310-1-git-send-email-hpa-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-20 16:39   ` [RFC UNTESTED PATCH] eal_common_cpuflags: Fix %rbx corruption, and simplify the code Neil Horman
     [not found]     ` <20140320163921.GC7721-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-20 17:02       ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-03-20 18:04       ` Neil Horman
     [not found]         ` <20140320180443.GE7721-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-20 18:59           ` Neil Horman
2014-03-21 14:49       ` [PATCH v2] " Neil Horman
     [not found]         ` <1395413340-27392-1-git-send-email-nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-21 15:03           ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]             ` <532C54C6.2060202-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-21 17:48               ` Neil Horman
     [not found]                 ` <20140321174839.GB21998-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-24 11:18                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-03-24 17:44       ` [PATCH v3] " Neil Horman
     [not found]         ` <1395683088-19687-1-git-send-email-nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-24 18:09           ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]             ` <533074F0.3060204-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-24 19:52               ` Neil Horman
     [not found]                 ` <20140324195206.GG19368-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-24 20:47                   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
     [not found]                     ` <533099FB.5030702-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-25 10:41                       ` Neil Horman
2014-03-25 17:03       ` [PATCH v4] " Neil Horman
     [not found]         ` <1395767000-28709-1-git-send-email-nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-25 17:06           ` Chris Wright
2014-03-25 17:37           ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-25 19:52       ` [PATCH v5] " Neil Horman
     [not found]         ` <1395777179-4345-1-git-send-email-nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-25 20:51           ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]             ` <5331EC38.2070901-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-02 11:16               ` Neil Horman
     [not found]                 ` <20140402111643.GB6974-0o1r3XBGOEbbgkc5XkKeNuvMHUBZFtU3YPYVAmT7z5s@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-02 11:53                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-04-02 12:42               ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=533099FB.5030702@linux.intel.com \
    --to=hpa-vuqaysv1563yd54fqh9/ca@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.