From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rudolf Marek <r.marek@assembler.cz>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:17:38 +0000
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] IT8620E/IT8623E vs. IT8603E
Message-Id: <5330AF02.5010300@assembler.cz>
List-Id: <lm-sensors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20140316120945.4dc8b28c@endymion.delvare>
In-Reply-To: <20140316120945.4dc8b28c@endymion.delvare>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org

Hi all,

I developed the patch and I need a test from the Martin. In fact I found small 
typo (no code impact) which I will fix in the first patch, second patch just 
adds documentation and it87 will treat the IT8623E as it would be IT8603E 
similar way as we do for 8716/26 pair.

I will start new thread with my patches.

Thanks
Rudolf

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors