From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
To: Steve Wise
<swise-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>,
'Or Gerlitz' <or.gerlitz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
'Roland Dreier' <roland-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: 'Bart Van Assche' <bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>,
'linux-rdma' <linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: device removal hangs where there are open uverbs refs
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:44:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53315E18.2010601@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001401cf476c$db7e95e0$927bc1a0$@opengridcomputing.com>
On 03/24/14 15:25, Steve Wise wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org [mailto:linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org] On
>> Behalf Of Or Gerlitz
>> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 2:16 AM
>> To: Roland Dreier
>> Cc: Bart Van Assche; linux-rdma
>> Subject: device removal hangs where there are open uverbs refs
>>
>> Hi Roland,
>>
>> >From time to time I get a customer case which goes through something
>> like the below trace which steps on a design limitation of the
>> upstream IB stack -- namely, if you have a process with open uverbs
>> reference -- device removal flow hangs and this would happen with any
>> device/driver, nothing specific to mlx4. So... I think it's about time
>> to address it.
>>
>> Can't we just foricibly close their uverbs file descriptor from within
>> the kernel and drop the ref?
>>
>> Or.
>>
>> INFO: task mlx4:2003 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>> Call Trace:
>> [<ffffffff814fe6a5>] schedule_timeout+0x215/0x2e0
>> [<ffffffff814fe323>] wait_for_common+0x123/0x180
>> [<ffffffff814fe43d>] wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x20
>> [<ffffffffa04600b3>] ib_uverbs_remove_one+0x73/0xa0 [ib_uverbs]
>> [<ffffffffa036fa6f>] ib_unregister_device+0x4f/0x100 [ib_core]
>> [<ffffffffa038fd76>] mlx4_ib_remove+0x26/0x110 [mlx4_ib]
>> [<ffffffffa0348391>] mlx4_remove_device+0x71/0x90 [mlx4_core]
>> [<ffffffffa03483f3>] mlx4_unregister_device+0x43/0x90 [mlx4_core]
>> [<ffffffffa0349bb8>] mlx4_change_port_types+0x68/0x120 [mlx4_core]
>> [<ffffffffa03546ab>] mlx4_sense_port+0x9b/0xd0 [mlx4_core]
>> [<ffffffff8108c760>] worker_thread+0x170/0x2a0
>> [<ffffffff81091d66>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
>> [<ffffffff8100c14a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
>
> Here is a previous thread discussing the issue in 2010:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=126961887406371&w=3
There might be an easier solution for the issue reported by Or than what
has been discussed in 2010. Is it necessary that mlx4_sense_port()
blocks until ib_uverbs_remove_one() has finished ? Since
mlx4_sense_port() runs periodically, how about changing that function
such that it does not invoke mlx4_unregister_device() if a port is still
in use but instead tries again to change the port type during the next
call of mlx4_sense_port() ?
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-25 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-24 7:16 device removal hangs where there are open uverbs refs Or Gerlitz
[not found] ` <CAJZOPZ+No+UY+owMOCVFVWKOFy1xG4zsX23F9CT9ZXC2a0SNzA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-24 14:25 ` Steve Wise
2014-03-25 10:44 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
[not found] ` <53315E18.2010601-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-25 14:35 ` Carol Soto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53315E18.2010601@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche-hinycgiudog@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=or.gerlitz-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=roland-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swise-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.