From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <533168CA.6010703@xenomai.org> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:30:18 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <40a355c3.3a46.144f6fe3c91.Coremail.ericvic@163.com> <36d2cb6f.ac9a.144f81578c0.Coremail.ericvic@163.com> In-Reply-To: <36d2cb6f.ac9a.144f81578c0.Coremail.ericvic@163.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] On mx6q specifically, it seems the framebuffer is a latency killer List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?5bWM5YWl5byP5bel56iL5biI?= Cc: "xenomai@xenomai.org" On 03/25/2014 08:12 AM, 嵌入式工程师 wrote: > > Thanks ,I find the problem like mine ,http://www.marshut.com/iqphrn/user-space-problems.html Please try the ipipe-3.0-imx6q branch on git://git.xenomai.org/ipipe-gch.git It should solve high latencies with imx6q. Note however that a 40us latency is not really considered a problem for this class of processors. -- Gilles.