From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Herrholz Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:57:38 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (it87) Add support for IT8623E Message-Id: <53316F32.90601@rzschernsdorf.de> List-Id: References: <1354475868-10032-3-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <1354475868-10032-3-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi Jean, it works. I didn't thought about trying out "sensors" without the chip=20 being found by sensors-detect. Its properly detected with the updated=20 sensors-detect as well. Here is the output of sensors: Before: martin@computername ~/it87 $ sensors k10temp-pci-00c3 Adapter: PCI adapter temp1: +4.5=B0C (high =3D +70.0=B0C) (crit =3D +70.0=B0C, hyst =3D +69.0=B0C) Now: martin@computername ~/it87 $ sensors k10temp-pci-00c3 Adapter: PCI adapter temp1: +5.0=B0C (high =3D +70.0=B0C) (crit =3D +70.0=B0C, hyst =3D +69.0=B0C) it8603-isa-0290 Adapter: ISA adapter in0: +0.85 V (min =3D +1.21 V, max =3D +0.78 V) ALARM in1: +1.63 V (min =3D +0.86 V, max =3D +1.52 V) ALARM in2: +2.04 V (min =3D +1.97 V, max =3D +0.38 V) ALARM in3: +2.02 V (min =3D +0.47 V, max =3D +0.02 V) ALARM in4: +1.24 V (min =3D +0.43 V, max =3D +0.14 V) ALARM 3VSB: +3.34 V (min =3D +1.87 V, max =3D +1.54 V) ALARM Vbat: +3.24 V +3.3V: +3.38 V fan1: 1066 RPM (min =3D 200 RPM) fan2: 0 RPM (min =3D 602 RPM) ALARM temp1: +34.0=B0C (low =3D +116.0=B0C, high =3D +32.0=B0C) ALARM s= ensor =3D=20 thermistor temp2: +33.0=B0C (low =3D +99.0=B0C, high =3D +0.0=B0C) ALARM se= nsor =3D=20 thermistor temp3: -128.0=B0C (low =3D -30.0=B0C, high =3D -80.0=B0C) sensor = =3D thermistor intrusion0: OK And sensors-detect: ... Found `ITE IT8623E Super IO Sensors' Success! (address 0x290, driver `it87') ... Driver `it87': * ISA bus, address 0x290 Chip `ITE IT8623E Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9) Thank you all for your help. Best Regards Martin On 25.03.2014 12:36, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:12:46 +0100, Martin Herrholz wrote: >> i did install the module like mentioned in your linked Instructions and >> redone the sensors-detect. >> I still get the same result: >> >> Trying family `ITE'... Yes >> Found unknown chip with ID 0x8623 >> (logical device 4 has address 0x290, could be sensors) > This is expected, sensors-detect has its own detection code which is > independent from the installed drivers. You can try the latest version > at: > http://dl.lm-sensors.org/lm-sensors/files/sensors-detect > > which should detect your chip properly. > >> I had no it87 module installed prior to it, so i had nothing to remove. >> The module compiles/loads without errors. > Great. But does it work? What does "sensors" say? > _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors