From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alex chen Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:25:22 +0800 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: do not put bh when buffer_uptodate failed In-Reply-To: <5331CEB1.8030706@oracle.com> References: <53312AD6.4080607@huawei.com> <5331CEB1.8030706@oracle.com> Message-ID: <53322C82.6030800@huawei.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On 2014/3/26 2:45, Srinivas Eeda wrote: > These changes looks good to me. However ocfs2_read_blocks and > ocfs2_read_blocks_sync needs the same fix ? :) There is no need to do this in ocfs2_read_blocks and ocfs2_read_blocks_sync, because bh will be set to NULL after put_bh, and brelse will handle it. > > On 03/25/2014 12:05 AM, alex chen wrote: >> Do not put bh when buffer_uptodate failed in ocfs2_write_block and >> ocfs2_write_super_or_backup, because it will put bh in b_end_io. >> Otherwise it will hit a warning "VFS: brelse: Trying to free free >> buffer". >> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Chen >> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi >> --- >> fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c | 2 -- >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c b/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c >> index 5b704c6..1edcb14 100644 >> --- a/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c >> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c >> @@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ int ocfs2_write_block(struct ocfs2_super *osb, struct buffer_head *bh, >> * information for this bh as it's not marked locally >> * uptodate. */ >> ret = -EIO; >> - put_bh(bh); >> mlog_errno(ret); >> } >> >> @@ -420,7 +419,6 @@ int ocfs2_write_super_or_backup(struct ocfs2_super *osb, >> >> if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) { >> ret = -EIO; >> - put_bh(bh); >> mlog_errno(ret); >> } >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Ocfs2-devel mailing list > Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com > https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel > >