From: "Arnaud Rébillout" <rebillout@syscom.ch>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] dbus-triggerd: new package
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:01:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53327B4B.2010005@syscom.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5331E316.4030706@mind.be>
Hi Arnout,
> For the other dbus-* packages, the dbus dependencies are repeated (even
> though they're automatic because of the depends on DBUS). So I would do
> that here as well. And that means of course that there should also be a
> comment in case of missing toolchain features. See dbus-cpp for an example.
You're right, I forgot the comments, and the host-pkgconf dependency as
well.
I will do as you suggest for the DBUS dependencies.
> Patch misses a description + Signed-off-by.
Correct.
> If you're anyway patching the Makefile, you can just as well make it:
>
> CFLAGS?=-Wall -O3
> CFLAGS+=`$(PKG_CONFIG) --cflags dbus-1`
> LDLIBS+=`$(PKG_CONFIG) --libs dbus-1`
>
>
>
> Will you send this patch upstream?
Yep. I will send a patch right now.
> This should be $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS) which includes all of the above
> and more.
OK. Actually, I've always been wondering it was OK to use
TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS in a generic package, I never dared to do it.
> Note BTW that the patch above refers to LDLIBS instead of LDFLAGS. Is
> LDFLAGS used?
Yep, LDFLAGS is used automatically by Make in this Makefile.
Thanks for your comments, I will send the patch upstream a wait a little
for the author's comments on it.
Regards
--
Arnaud R?billout
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20140326/f245da9a/attachment.html>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-26 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-25 7:59 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/1] dbus-triggerd, a helpful little daemon Arnaud Rébillout
2014-03-25 7:59 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] dbus-triggerd: new package Arnaud Rébillout
2014-03-25 20:12 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-03-26 7:01 ` Arnaud Rébillout [this message]
2014-03-26 7:46 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53327B4B.2010005@syscom.ch \
--to=rebillout@syscom.ch \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.