From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57061)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1WSl2a-000488-DG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 06:26:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1WSl2U-0006RS-CH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 06:26:36 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34907)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1WSl2U-0006RO-4Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 06:26:30 -0400
Message-ID: <5332AB4D.1090200@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:26:21 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1395799358-16499-1-git-send-email-zhen-hual@hp.com>
	<5332A419.1090700@redhat.com> <5332A50B.7000105@hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <5332A50B.7000105@hp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] virtio-blk: Use a req pool instead of
	malloc/free
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Li, ZhenHua" <zhen-hual@hp.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Il 26/03/2014 10:59, Li, ZhenHua ha scritto:
> Sorry I am confused .
>
> There are two ways now:
> 1. Just use g_slice_new to replace malloc/free.
> 2. Use a pool as a replacement of frequently create/destroy reqs. And
> when create the pool, use g_slice_new.
>
> Which are you meaning?

I think both I and Stefan mean (1).

Paolo