All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Rushton <mvrushton@gmail.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>,
	Matt Wilson <msw@linux.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] page_alloc: use first half of higher order chunks when halving
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:47:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533312C0.1050507@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140326163609.GD21368@phenom.dumpdata.com>

On 03/26/14 09:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:59:04AM -0700, Matthew Rushton wrote:
>> On 03/26/14 08:15, Matt Wilson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:08:01AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>>> Could you elaborate a bit more on the use-case please?
>>>> My understanding is that most drivers use a scatter gather list - in which
>>>> case it does not matter if the underlaying MFNs in the PFNs spare are
>>>> not contingous.
>>>>
>>>> But I presume the issue you are hitting is with drivers doing dma_map_page
>>>> and the page is not 4KB but rather large (compound page). Is that the
>>>> problem you have observed?
>>> Drivers are using very large size arguments to dma_alloc_coherent()
>>> for things like RX and TX descriptor rings.
> Large size like larger than 512kB? That would also cause problems
> on baremetal then when swiotlb is activated I believe.

I was looking at network IO performance so the buffers would not have 
been that large. I think large in this context is relative to the 4k 
page size and the odds of the buffer spanning a page boundary. For 
context I saw ~5-10% performance increase with guest network throughput 
by avoiding bounce buffers and also saw dom0 tcp streaming performance 
go from ~6Gb/s to over 9Gb/s on my test setup with a 10Gb NIC.

>
>>> --msw
>> It's the dma streaming api I've noticed the problem with, so
>> dma_map_single(). Applicable swiotlb code would be
>> xen_swiotlb_map_page() and range_straddles_page_boundary(). So yes
>> for larger buffers it can cause bouncing.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-26 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-25 11:22 [RFC PATCH] page_alloc: use first half of higher order chunks when halving Matt Wilson
2014-03-25 11:44 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-03-25 13:20   ` Matt Wilson
2014-03-25 20:18     ` Matthew Rushton
2014-03-25 12:19 ` Tim Deegan
2014-03-25 13:27   ` Matt Wilson
2014-03-25 20:09     ` Matthew Rushton
2014-03-26  9:55       ` Tim Deegan
2014-03-26 10:17         ` Matt Wilson
2014-03-26 10:44           ` David Vrabel
2014-03-26 10:48             ` Matt Wilson
2014-03-26 11:13               ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-26 11:41                 ` Matt Wilson
2014-03-26 11:45                   ` Andrew Cooper
2014-03-26 11:50                     ` Matt Wilson
2014-03-26 12:43               ` David Vrabel
2014-03-26 12:48                 ` Matt Wilson
2014-03-26 15:08           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-26 15:15             ` Matt Wilson
2014-03-26 15:59               ` Matthew Rushton
2014-03-26 16:36                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-26 17:47                   ` Matthew Rushton [this message]
2014-03-26 17:56                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-26 22:15                       ` Matthew Rushton
2014-03-28 17:02                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-28 22:06                           ` Matthew Rushton
2014-03-31 14:15                             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-01  3:25                               ` Matthew Rushton
2014-04-01 10:48                                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-01 12:22                                   ` Tim Deegan
2014-04-02  0:17                                     ` Matthew Rushton
2014-04-02  7:52                                       ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-02 10:06                                         ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-02 10:15                                           ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-02 10:20                                             ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-09 22:21                                               ` Matthew Rushton
2014-04-10  6:14                                                 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-11 20:20                                                   ` Matthew Rushton
2014-04-11 17:05                                                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-11 20:28                                                   ` Matthew Rushton
2014-04-12  1:34                                                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-13 21:32                                                   ` Tim Deegan
2014-04-14  8:51                                                     ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-14 14:40                                                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-14 15:34                                                         ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-16 14:15                                                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-17  1:34                                                             ` Matthew Rushton
2014-05-07 23:16                                                             ` Matthew Rushton
2014-05-08 18:05                                                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-05-14 15:06                                                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-05-20 19:26                                                                 ` Matthew Rushton
2014-05-23 19:00                                                                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-04 22:25                                                                     ` Matthew Rushton
2014-06-05  9:32                                                                       ` David Vrabel
2014-03-26 16:34               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=533312C0.1050507@gmail.com \
    --to=mvrushton@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=msw@amazon.com \
    --cc=msw@linux.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.