From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linaro-acpi <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
Tony <tony.luck@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: APEI hardware reduced profile
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:17:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5333ECC4.5080208@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140326203650.GA3933@nazgul.tnic>
On 03/26/14 21:36, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:10:47PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Yet, it would be better if you could be a little more specific about
>> what are your plans and what are the common/not-common features that
>> you're mapping.
>
> Well, I don't see anything x86-specific in ghes.c on a quick scan - just
> the GHES gunk itself, which is the spec. Which begs the question, how
> much of the APEI spec is ARM going to implement and if it is a subset,
> this definitely needs to be handled cleanly. Judging by your text, it
> seems like you want to ignore the correctable errors part...?
>
> So yes, Tomasz, you want to be much more specific here :-)
Thanks for your comment. Please refer to my email to Mauro. I have put
more explanation there.
Correctable errors are fine for ARM. But ARM is not going to have NMI
ever. So as responded to Mauro, I am focusing on making NMI as the
feature for ghes.c.
Thanks,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-27 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-26 12:08 RFC: APEI hardware reduced profile Tomasz Nowicki
2014-03-26 14:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-26 15:10 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2014-03-26 20:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-03-27 9:17 ` Tomasz Nowicki [this message]
2014-03-27 9:05 ` Tomasz Nowicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5333ECC4.5080208@linaro.org \
--to=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.