All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] workqueue: use manager lock only to protect worker_idr
@ 2014-03-26 14:41 Lai Jiangshan
  2014-03-27 12:03 ` Lai Jiangshan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2014-03-26 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo, linux-kernel; +Cc: Lai Jiangshan

worker_idr is always accessed in manager lock context currently.
worker_idr is highly related to managers, it will be unlikely
accessed in pool->lock only in future.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |   34 ++++++----------------------------
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 0c74979..f5b68a3 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -123,8 +123,7 @@ enum {
  *    cpu or grabbing pool->lock is enough for read access.  If
  *    POOL_DISASSOCIATED is set, it's identical to L.
  *
- * MG: pool->manager_mutex and pool->lock protected.  Writes require both
- *     locks.  Reads can happen under either lock.
+ * M: pool->manager_mutex protected.
  *
  * PL: wq_pool_mutex protected.
  *
@@ -163,7 +162,7 @@ struct worker_pool {
 	/* see manage_workers() for details on the two manager mutexes */
 	struct mutex		manager_arb;	/* manager arbitration */
 	struct mutex		manager_mutex;	/* manager exclusion */
-	struct idr		worker_idr;	/* MG: worker IDs and iteration */
+	struct idr		worker_idr;	/* M: worker IDs and iteration */
 
 	struct workqueue_attrs	*attrs;		/* I: worker attributes */
 	struct hlist_node	hash_node;	/* PL: unbound_pool_hash node */
@@ -339,16 +338,6 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
 			   lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex),			\
 			   "sched RCU or wq->mutex should be held")
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-#define assert_manager_or_pool_lock(pool)				\
-	WARN_ONCE(debug_locks &&					\
-		  !lockdep_is_held(&(pool)->manager_mutex) &&		\
-		  !lockdep_is_held(&(pool)->lock),			\
-		  "pool->manager_mutex or ->lock should be held")
-#else
-#define assert_manager_or_pool_lock(pool)	do { } while (0)
-#endif
-
 #define for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)				\
 	for ((pool) = &per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu)[0];		\
 	     (pool) < &per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu)[NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS]; \
@@ -377,14 +366,14 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
  * @wi: integer used for iteration
  * @pool: worker_pool to iterate workers of
  *
- * This must be called with either @pool->manager_mutex or ->lock held.
+ * This must be called with either @pool->manager_mutex.
  *
  * The if/else clause exists only for the lockdep assertion and can be
  * ignored.
  */
 #define for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)				\
 	idr_for_each_entry(&(pool)->worker_idr, (worker), (wi))		\
-		if (({ assert_manager_or_pool_lock((pool)); false; })) { } \
+		if (({ lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex); false; })) { } \
 		else
 
 /**
@@ -1717,13 +1706,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	 * ID is needed to determine kthread name.  Allocate ID first
 	 * without installing the pointer.
 	 */
-	idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
-	spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
-
-	id = idr_alloc(&pool->worker_idr, NULL, 0, 0, GFP_NOWAIT);
-
-	spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
-	idr_preload_end();
+	id = idr_alloc(&pool->worker_idr, NULL, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (id < 0)
 		goto fail;
 
@@ -1765,18 +1748,13 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
 		worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND;
 
 	/* successful, commit the pointer to idr */
-	spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
 	idr_replace(&pool->worker_idr, worker, worker->id);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
 	return worker;
 
 fail:
-	if (id >= 0) {
-		spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
+	if (id >= 0)
 		idr_remove(&pool->worker_idr, id);
-		spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
-	}
 	kfree(worker);
 	return NULL;
 }
-- 
1.7.4.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] workqueue: use manager lock only to protect worker_idr
  2014-03-26 14:41 [PATCH] workqueue: use manager lock only to protect worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
@ 2014-03-27 12:03 ` Lai Jiangshan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2014-03-27 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lai Jiangshan; +Cc: Tejun Heo, linux-kernel

please omit this patch and wait for my new patchset.

Thanks,
Lai

On 03/26/2014 10:41 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> worker_idr is always accessed in manager lock context currently.
> worker_idr is highly related to managers, it will be unlikely
> accessed in pool->lock only in future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  kernel/workqueue.c |   34 ++++++----------------------------
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 0c74979..f5b68a3 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -123,8 +123,7 @@ enum {
>   *    cpu or grabbing pool->lock is enough for read access.  If
>   *    POOL_DISASSOCIATED is set, it's identical to L.
>   *
> - * MG: pool->manager_mutex and pool->lock protected.  Writes require both
> - *     locks.  Reads can happen under either lock.
> + * M: pool->manager_mutex protected.
>   *
>   * PL: wq_pool_mutex protected.
>   *
> @@ -163,7 +162,7 @@ struct worker_pool {
>  	/* see manage_workers() for details on the two manager mutexes */
>  	struct mutex		manager_arb;	/* manager arbitration */
>  	struct mutex		manager_mutex;	/* manager exclusion */
> -	struct idr		worker_idr;	/* MG: worker IDs and iteration */
> +	struct idr		worker_idr;	/* M: worker IDs and iteration */
>  
>  	struct workqueue_attrs	*attrs;		/* I: worker attributes */
>  	struct hlist_node	hash_node;	/* PL: unbound_pool_hash node */
> @@ -339,16 +338,6 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
>  			   lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex),			\
>  			   "sched RCU or wq->mutex should be held")
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> -#define assert_manager_or_pool_lock(pool)				\
> -	WARN_ONCE(debug_locks &&					\
> -		  !lockdep_is_held(&(pool)->manager_mutex) &&		\
> -		  !lockdep_is_held(&(pool)->lock),			\
> -		  "pool->manager_mutex or ->lock should be held")
> -#else
> -#define assert_manager_or_pool_lock(pool)	do { } while (0)
> -#endif
> -
>  #define for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)				\
>  	for ((pool) = &per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu)[0];		\
>  	     (pool) < &per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu)[NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS]; \
> @@ -377,14 +366,14 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
>   * @wi: integer used for iteration
>   * @pool: worker_pool to iterate workers of
>   *
> - * This must be called with either @pool->manager_mutex or ->lock held.
> + * This must be called with either @pool->manager_mutex.
>   *
>   * The if/else clause exists only for the lockdep assertion and can be
>   * ignored.
>   */
>  #define for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)				\
>  	idr_for_each_entry(&(pool)->worker_idr, (worker), (wi))		\
> -		if (({ assert_manager_or_pool_lock((pool)); false; })) { } \
> +		if (({ lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex); false; })) { } \
>  		else
>  
>  /**
> @@ -1717,13 +1706,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
>  	 * ID is needed to determine kthread name.  Allocate ID first
>  	 * without installing the pointer.
>  	 */
> -	idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> -	spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
> -
> -	id = idr_alloc(&pool->worker_idr, NULL, 0, 0, GFP_NOWAIT);
> -
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
> -	idr_preload_end();
> +	id = idr_alloc(&pool->worker_idr, NULL, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (id < 0)
>  		goto fail;
>  
> @@ -1765,18 +1748,13 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
>  		worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND;
>  
>  	/* successful, commit the pointer to idr */
> -	spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
>  	idr_replace(&pool->worker_idr, worker, worker->id);
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
>  
>  	return worker;
>  
>  fail:
> -	if (id >= 0) {
> -		spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
> +	if (id >= 0)
>  		idr_remove(&pool->worker_idr, id);
> -		spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
> -	}
>  	kfree(worker);
>  	return NULL;
>  }


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-27 12:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-26 14:41 [PATCH] workqueue: use manager lock only to protect worker_idr Lai Jiangshan
2014-03-27 12:03 ` Lai Jiangshan

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.