All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: add __WQ_FREEZING and remove POOL_FREEZING
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 20:08:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533414C7.1050607@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395741364-19489-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 03/25/2014 05:56 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> freezing is nothing related to pools, but POOL_FREEZING adds a connection,
> and causes freeze_workqueues_begin() and thaw_workqueues() complicated.
> 
> Since freezing is workqueue instance attribute, so we introduce __WQ_FREEZING
> to wq->flags instead and remove POOL_FREEZING.
> 
> we set __WQ_FREEZING only when freezable(to simplify pwq_adjust_max_active()),
> make freeze_workqueues_begin() and thaw_workqueues() fast skip non-freezable wq.
> 
> Changed from previous patches(requested by tj):
> 	1) added the WARN_ON_ONCE() back
> 	2) merged the two patches as one

Ping.

Hi, Tejun

You had reviewed this patch several rounds.
I had applied all your requests(the last two is listed above) in your comments.

I'm deeply sorry for responding so late.

Thanks,
Lai


> 
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/workqueue.h |    1 +
>  kernel/workqueue.c        |   43 ++++++++++++-------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
> index 704f4f6..a45202b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
> +++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
> @@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ enum {
>  	 */
>  	WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT	= 1 << 7,
>  
> +	__WQ_FREEZING		= 1 << 15, /* internel: workqueue is freezing */
>  	__WQ_DRAINING		= 1 << 16, /* internal: workqueue is draining */
>  	__WQ_ORDERED		= 1 << 17, /* internal: workqueue is ordered */
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 193e977..0c74979 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ enum {
>  	 */
>  	POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS	= 1 << 0,	/* need to manage workers */
>  	POOL_DISASSOCIATED	= 1 << 2,	/* cpu can't serve workers */
> -	POOL_FREEZING		= 1 << 3,	/* freeze in progress */
>  
>  	/* worker flags */
>  	WORKER_STARTED		= 1 << 0,	/* started */
> @@ -3632,9 +3631,6 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
>  	if (!pool || init_worker_pool(pool) < 0)
>  		goto fail;
>  
> -	if (workqueue_freezing)
> -		pool->flags |= POOL_FREEZING;
> -
>  	lockdep_set_subclass(&pool->lock, 1);	/* see put_pwq() */
>  	copy_workqueue_attrs(pool->attrs, attrs);
>  
> @@ -3730,18 +3726,13 @@ static void pwq_unbound_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
>  static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
>  {
>  	struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq;
> -	bool freezable = wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE;
>  
> -	/* for @wq->saved_max_active */
> +	/* for @wq->saved_max_active and @wq->flags */
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
>  
> -	/* fast exit for non-freezable wqs */
> -	if (!freezable && pwq->max_active == wq->saved_max_active)
> -		return;
> -
>  	spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
>  
> -	if (!freezable || !(pwq->pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING)) {
> +	if (!(wq->flags & __WQ_FREEZING)) {
>  		pwq->max_active = wq->saved_max_active;
>  
>  		while (!list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works) &&
> @@ -4250,6 +4241,8 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt,
>  	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
> +	if ((wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE) && workqueue_freezing)
> +		wq->flags |= __WQ_FREEZING;
>  	for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
>  		pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
>  	mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
> @@ -4856,26 +4849,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_on_cpu);
>   */
>  void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)
>  {
> -	struct worker_pool *pool;
>  	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
>  	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
> -	int pi;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
>  
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(workqueue_freezing);
>  	workqueue_freezing = true;
>  
> -	/* set FREEZING */
> -	for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
> -		spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING);
> -		pool->flags |= POOL_FREEZING;
> -		spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
> -	}
> -
>  	list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
> +		if (!(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE))
> +			continue;
>  		mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(wq->flags & __WQ_FREEZING);
> +		wq->flags |= __WQ_FREEZING;
>  		for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
>  			pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
>  		mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
> @@ -4943,25 +4930,19 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void)
>  {
>  	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
>  	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
> -	struct worker_pool *pool;
> -	int pi;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
>  
>  	if (!workqueue_freezing)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  
> -	/* clear FREEZING */
> -	for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
> -		spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(!(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING));
> -		pool->flags &= ~POOL_FREEZING;
> -		spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
> -	}
> -
>  	/* restore max_active and repopulate worklist */
>  	list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
> +		if (!(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE))
> +			continue;
>  		mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(!(wq->flags & __WQ_FREEZING));
> +		wq->flags &= ~__WQ_FREEZING;
>  		for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
>  			pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
>  		mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);


  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-27 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-04  2:05 [PATCH 1/7] workqueue: add __WQ_FREEZING and remove POOL_FREEZING Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] workqueue: set __WQ_FREEZING only when freezable Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] workqueue: rename rebind_workers() to associate_cpu_pool() Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:15   ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] workqueue: simplify workqueue_cpu_up_callback(CPU_ONLINE) Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] workqueue, use default pwq when fail to allocate node pwd Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:34   ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] workqueue: node-awared allocation for unbound pool Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:38   ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-04  2:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] workqueue: avoid false negative WARN_ON() Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:55   ` [PATCH] workqueue: avoid false negative WARN_ON() in destroy_workqueue() Tejun Heo
2013-04-05  7:39     ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-04 14:12 ` [PATCH 1/7] workqueue: add __WQ_FREEZING and remove POOL_FREEZING Tejun Heo
2013-04-20 16:12   ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-04-21  1:29     ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-25  9:56       ` [PATCH] " Lai Jiangshan
2014-03-27 12:08         ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2014-03-27 14:48           ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-16 19:51         ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-16 23:58           ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-17 15:29             ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-16 20:50         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=533414C7.1050607@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.