From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52114) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTDHe-0006b2-Vm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:36:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTDHX-00026r-GJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:36:02 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34220 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTDHX-00025I-As for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:35:55 -0400 Message-ID: <53345367.2040402@suse.de> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 17:35:51 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1394648907-20096-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1394648907-20096-13-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <5320B396.20005@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next v3 12/15] nvme: Permit zero-length block devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Keith Busch Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi Hi Keith, Am 12.03.2014 21:13, schrieb Keith Busch: > On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >> Tonight is Hard Freeze for 2.0. If you could also review the matching >> test case http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/329627/ I would put both i= n >> my pull. >=20 > Looks great! I'd apply the new test case, but it won't without the > previous "pvpanic-test" patch in your series. I had held off putting them in my pull for -rc0, but not seeing patches/pull from your side I am queuing them now for -rc1. Can I formalize your review as an Acked-by of both, if not turn your Signed-off-by into a Reviewed-by for this patch here? Thanks, Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg