From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/19] tree-diff: rework diff_tree interface to be sha1 based Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:52:11 +0100 Message-ID: <53351C1B.6040609@viscovery.net> References: <0b82e2de0edee4a590e7b4165c65938aef7090f5.1393257006.git.kirr@mns.spb.ru> <20140325092215.GB3777@mini.zxlink> <20140326195201.GB16002@mini.zxlink> <20140327142438.GE17333@mini.zxlink> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kirill Smelkov , kirr@mns.spb.ru, git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 28 07:52:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WTQeO-0000Ig-3q for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:52:24 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751342AbaC1GwT (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2014 02:52:19 -0400 Received: from so.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:45132 "EHLO so.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751010AbaC1GwS (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2014 02:52:18 -0400 Received: from [81.10.228.254] (helo=theia.linz.viscovery) by so.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WTQeB-0002ms-Nf; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:52:12 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.95] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.95]) by theia.linz.viscovery (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A71916613; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:52:11 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 3/27/2014 19:48, schrieb Junio C Hamano: >> From: Kirill Smelkov >> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:21:46 +0400 >> ... > > By the way, in general I do not appreciate people lying on the Date: > with an in-body header in their patches, either in the original or > in rerolls. format-patch is not very cooperative in this aspect. When I prepare a patch series with format-patch, I find myself editing out the Date: line from all patches it produces again and again. :-( -- Hannes