From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp3.ugent.be ([157.193.49.127]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WTYRY-0008Sr-N5 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:11:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (mcheck2.ugent.be [157.193.49.249]) by smtp3.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B64C3CA for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:11:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp3.ugent.be ([IPv6:::ffff:157.193.49.127]) by localhost (mcheck2.UGent.be [::ffff:157.193.43.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HZBAbSdsCUWY for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:11:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail2.intec.ugent.be (mail2.intec.ugent.be [157.193.214.245]) by smtp3.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BCFC146 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:11:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.intec.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4993024 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:16:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail2.intec.ugent.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.intec.ugent.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hXpJjX+0R36f for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:16:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [157.193.214.167] (eckel.intec.ugent.be [157.193.214.167]) by mail2.intec.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342BB23 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:16:21 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5335910B.3000702@intec.ugent.be> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:11:07 +0100 From: Bart Jooris MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Running throughput tests References: <00ea01cee403$5331f1e0$f995d5a0$@sparklan.com> <006301cef71c$d850ec10$88f2c430$@sparklan.com> <52A98706.7080907@intec.ugent.be> <008d01cef722$2a9c05e0$7fd411a0$@sparklan.com> <52A9DEF9.8080305@intec.ugent.be> <012e01cef7e0$99017e70$cb047b50$@sparklan.com> <52AACFB9.8080901@intec.ugent.be> <006301cefa3c$44c07b50$ce4171f0$@sparklan.com> <52AEC26B.2060400@intec.ugent.be> <007f01cefa41$8a940de0$9fbc29a0$@sparklan.com> <52AEE61F.5030505@intec.ugent.be> <006b01cefacb$6c0b2d60$44218820$@sparklan.com> <52B00B10.3050300@intec.ugent.be> <004b01cefb9d$04a543e0$0defcba0$@sparklan.com> <52B2AE75.9050206@intec.ugent.be> <00df01cf0090$05944f10$10bced30$@sparklan.com> <52B9672E.9000701@intec.ugent.be> <008c01cf012e$e59563d0$b0c02b70$@sparklan.com> <530A64E5.2040401@intec.ugent.be> <530B0670.1010009@stackframe.org> <530E5EF2.8070800@intec.ugent.be> <87y50weecb.fsf_-_@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <87y50weecb.fsf_-_@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Reply-To: Bart.Jooris@intec.ugent.be List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Dear Kalle, On 02/27/2014 04:59 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Changing subject. > > Bart Jooris writes: > >> Just got a stable 160Mbps (iperf udp, tweeking the distance and ended >> up around 50cm) on a Ubuntu 13.10 client (regulatory.bin still not >> ok). >> Not yet the 300Mbps as I read earlier on the thread. >> What could be the next steps to speed up the link? > First I would use the full hostapd configuration which I just added to > the wiki: > > http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath10k/configuration#Full_hostapd_configuration > > Next I would disable all possible debug features from kernel and make > sure that they are not included in the build. And last try to find a > free channel with little interference as possible. > > I'm sure others have better ideas. > No luck for now. 160Mbps seems to be the limit using the mentioned configuration (I had to fix the channel to 36 and add vht_oper_centr_freq_seg0_idx=42 again to bring up the AP) I'm using sparkLAN WPEA-351AC cards with QCA9880 chip set. I' ve got this info from SparkLAN: On 03/03/2014 11:35 AM, (SparkLAN) wrote: > It seems like you are trying to test on AP mode with DFS band, but > unfortunately Ath9K and 10K does not support that so far. You are probably using Compex cards with the same chip set? Based on the chip set, I should be able to get higher bitrates or is it possbile that the WPEA-351AC card needs another configuration? Thanks a lot, Bart _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k