From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] xen: arm: resync low level asm primitive from Linux Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:00:10 +0000 Message-ID: <5335B8AA.70909@linaro.org> References: <1395841009.12547.11.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <20140327165959.GM91759@deinos.phlegethon.org> <1395939728.22909.212.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <20140327170428.GG91261@deinos.phlegethon.org> <1395940686.22909.229.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1395940686.22909.229.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Keir Fraser , Tim Deegan , xen-devel , Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/27/2014 05:18 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: >> Yep, something along those lines. Or equivalent linker runes, I >> suppose, though that's nastier. > > Right. Not sure if ENDPROC need duplcating or not, and if not whether > the unclosed ENTRY would be an issue. I suppose that would then require > linker runes. ENTRY and ENDPROC are not correlated: - ENTRY: is mandatory for both to set the symbol as global - ENDPROC: will set useful information for debugging. Regards, -- Julien Grall