From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org (Taras Kondratiuk)
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 20:13:05 +0200
Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: kprobes: big-endian support
In-Reply-To: <20140328112841.GF7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <52D3D784.2000600@linaro.org> <53053769.5090100@linaro.org>
 <5332AB5A.90109@linaro.org> <20140328112841.GF7528@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <5335BBB1.60402@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 03/28/2014 01:28 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:26:34PM +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
>> On 02/20/2014 12:59 AM, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
>>
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> Is there any issue with this pull request?
>> Should I do something to get it pulled?
> 
> There's nothing wrong, apart from me being far too busy hacking on really
> crap code to care about reading much email - which means that lots of
> email simply just gets buried and lost.
> 
> There is now a problem with this pull - it conflicts very badly with Dave
> Long's uprobes code, which I've already pulled, so much so that I'm not
> happy to do the conflict resolution since I know nothing about this code,
> and it's a feature I don't make any use of.

I've rebased it onto your for-next branch. Kprobes are functional
in LE and BE. I'll send an updated pull request after verifying uprobes.

> I notice that Dave Long and yourself are both under the Linaro umbrella,
> but there seems to be no coordination between yourselves, despite working
> on the same code...

Yeah, we are working in different teams and unfortunately haven't coordinated
an upstreaming sequence.

-- 
Taras Kondratiuk