From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D366E00BCA; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2SIxupj025612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.56.48] (128.224.56.48) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.169.1; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:59:56 -0700 Message-ID: <5335C6AA.6020308@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 14:59:54 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Hart, Darren" , Richard Purdie References: <1396031047.14790.24.camel@ted> <5335BF1C.9030902@windriver.com> <5335BF6A.8080404@windriver.com> <1396031644.14790.26.camel@ted> <5335C1AF.5080904@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: yocto-builds , Denys Dmytriyenko , "poky@yoctoproject.org" , "WOLD, SAUL" Subject: Re: meta-yocto-bsp changes and 3.14 X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion & patch submission for meta-yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 19:00:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 14-03-28 02:57 PM, Hart, Darren wrote: > On 3/28/14, 11:38, "Bruce Ashfield" wrote: > >> On 14-03-28 02:34 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> >>> >>> With regard to beagleboard, whilst the kernel may have support for it, >>> I'd like to remove it from meta-yocto-bsp. >> >> ok. I had planned to just leave the compatible machine as 3.10 and leave >> the support there, since there are a few people who contact me regularly >> and poke with the support. >> >> Is there a place we can put them as a "retirement" home ? versus asking >> people to locally restore the support. > > The retirement home would be the 1.5 stable releases. Yes? Nope. That's my point, I have 3.10 changes for the Xm in linux-yocto 3.10 that lives in 1.6. We can make it less visible, but I'd like the configs to follow the latest versions of the tree. Bruce > > -- > Darren Hart > Yocto Project - Linux Kernel > Intel Open Source Technology Center > > >