From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 20:10:29 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init Message-Id: <5335E53C.6020208@cogentembedded.com> List-Id: References: <1395400154-25710-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> <20140328.142606.2032782733436495474.davem@davemloft.net> <5335CCBF.8030606@codethink.co.uk> <20140328.160024.136488246522581222.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20140328.160024.136488246522581222.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: David Miller , ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk Cc: linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com Hello. On 03/28/2014 11:00 PM, David Miller wrote: >> I thought it was against the net next tree, given the number of >> patches that are currently being applied to the sh_eth driver. > Fair enough, applied to net-next, thanks! It probably makes sense to queue this for the stable kernels as well. WBR, Sergei From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device during init Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 00:10:20 +0300 Message-ID: <5335E53C.6020208@cogentembedded.com> References: <1395400154-25710-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> <20140328.142606.2032782733436495474.davem@davemloft.net> <5335CCBF.8030606@codethink.co.uk> <20140328.160024.136488246522581222.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com To: David Miller , ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:59432 "EHLO mail-la0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752033AbaC1UKQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:10:16 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id y1so4069356lam.37 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:10:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140328.160024.136488246522581222.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello. On 03/28/2014 11:00 PM, David Miller wrote: >> I thought it was against the net next tree, given the number of >> patches that are currently being applied to the sh_eth driver. > Fair enough, applied to net-next, thanks! It probably makes sense to queue this for the stable kernels as well. WBR, Sergei