From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172] helo=ns3.lanforge.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WUf29-0007Zd-UV for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:26:02 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.236] (firewall.candelatech.com [70.89.124.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns3.lanforge.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s2VGPeLD007943 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:25:40 -0700 Message-ID: <53399703.1060302@candelatech.com> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:25:39 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Clean-ish rebase on top of 3.14.0 (final)? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k Kalle: In case you end up with your tree in a clean rebase on stock 3.14.0 (or as clean as is reasonable), could you let us know and give us a bit of time before pulling down more upstream stuff? The reason is that I would like to freeze a 3.14 kernel with whatever ath10k patches are currently in your tree and attempt to stabalize it... If that is not convenient, then don't worry..I can make it work one way or another. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k