From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: xen: implement multicall hypercall
	support.
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 12:02:22 +0100
Message-ID: <533A9CBE.9000107@citrix.com>
References: <1396015649-5886-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com>
	<1396015660-7834-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1396015660-7834-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: julien.grall@linaro.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 28/03/14 14:07, Ian Campbell wrote:
> As part of this make the usual change to xen_ulong_t in place of unsigned long.
> This change has no impact on x86.
> 
> The Linux defintion of struct multicall_entry.result differs from the Xen
> definition, I think for good reasons, and used a long rather than an unsigned
> long. Therefore introduce a xen_long_t, which is a long on x86 architectures
> and a signed 64-bit integer on ARM.

Shouldn't the Xen definition also be changed to use a long?

David