From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH] evtchn: eliminate 64k ports limitation Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 10:36:41 +0100 Message-ID: <533BDA29.4080301@citrix.com> References: <533BE06802000078000048B7@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WVHbC-0008R1-4e for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:36:46 +0000 In-Reply-To: <533BE06802000078000048B7@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel , Keir Fraser , David Vrabel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/04/14 09:03, Jan Beulich wrote: > The introduction of FIFO event channels claimed to support over 100k > ports, but failed to widen a number of 16-bit variables/operations. Reviewed-by: David Vrabel Thanks. David