From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F2CE00BD3 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 06:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s32D1CiP019437 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 2 Apr 2014 06:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.56.48] (128.224.56.48) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.169.1; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 06:01:12 -0700 Message-ID: <533C0A15.9070008@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 09:01:09 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Eggleton , Richard Purdie References: <5946317.EfKT5Psj4O@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <5946317.EfKT5Psj4O@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 0/7] poky/yocto-bsps: 3.10 and 3.14 updates X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion & patch submission for meta-yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 13:01:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 14-04-02 08:57 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Monday 31 March 2014 14:01:53 Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> Here's the resend of the 3.10 and 3.14 updates for the 3.14 kernel >> and 3.10.34 update. > > It seems like we should be dropping routerstationpro at this point as well. > I've started putting together patches to do this; the question is do we want > to preserve the removed pieces in some additional external layer? I know that I want them preserved somewhere. What we have in the 3.4 and 3.10 kernels for those retired BSPs continues to work fine (in the state that it was), and they'll continue to get -stable updates as I maintain the trees. And I wouldn't say no if someone sent a patch for a board. Shoving them into a retirement home layer works for me, I just don't have a compelling suggestion for the name of that layer. Bruce > > Cheers, > Paul >