All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable qspinlock PV support for XEN
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 16:38:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533C7557.60908@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140402143932.GA13097@phenom.dumpdata.com>

On 04/02/2014 10:39 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.locks b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
>> index a70fdeb..451e392 100644
>> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.locks
>> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
>> @@ -229,4 +229,4 @@ config ARCH_USE_QUEUE_SPINLOCK
>>
>>   config QUEUE_SPINLOCK
>>   	def_bool y if ARCH_USE_QUEUE_SPINLOCK
>> -	depends on SMP&&  (!PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS || !XEN)
>> +	depends on SMP
> If I read this correctly that means you cannot select any more the old
> ticketlocks? As in, if you select CONFIG_PARAVIRT on X86 it will automatically
> select ARCH_USE_QUEUE_SPINLOCK which will then enable this by default?
>
> Should the 'def_bool' be selectable?

My initial qspinlock patch allows it to be selectable, but there was 
comment that doing so would increase the testing matrix and so made it 
less desirable. That was why I made it the default for 64-bit code which 
are more likely to be used in large machines which benefit the most from 
this patch. 32-bit kernel will still use the ticket lock.

-Longman

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
	Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable qspinlock PV support for XEN
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 16:38:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533C7557.60908@hp.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20140402203847.dKlPM3WLJUe35ZyCihVvsP4IW7XpUxgmh_imVm5MK7I@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140402143932.GA13097@phenom.dumpdata.com>

On 04/02/2014 10:39 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.locks b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
>> index a70fdeb..451e392 100644
>> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.locks
>> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
>> @@ -229,4 +229,4 @@ config ARCH_USE_QUEUE_SPINLOCK
>>
>>   config QUEUE_SPINLOCK
>>   	def_bool y if ARCH_USE_QUEUE_SPINLOCK
>> -	depends on SMP&&  (!PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS || !XEN)
>> +	depends on SMP
> If I read this correctly that means you cannot select any more the old
> ticketlocks? As in, if you select CONFIG_PARAVIRT on X86 it will automatically
> select ARCH_USE_QUEUE_SPINLOCK which will then enable this by default?
>
> Should the 'def_bool' be selectable?

My initial qspinlock patch allows it to be selectable, but there was 
comment that doing so would increase the testing matrix and so made it 
less desirable. That was why I made it the default for 64-bit code which 
are more likely to be used in large machines which benefit the most from 
this patch. 32-bit kernel will still use the ticket lock.

-Longman

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-02 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-02 13:27 [PATCH v8 00/10] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 13:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-04 13:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-04 13:00     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-04 14:59     ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 14:59       ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 17:53       ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-04 17:53         ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-04 17:53       ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-07 14:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 14:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 14:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-04 14:59     ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 16:57     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 16:57       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 17:08       ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 17:08       ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 17:08         ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 17:54         ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-04 17:54           ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-04 17:54         ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-07 14:09         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 14:09           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 16:59           ` Waiman Long
2014-04-07 16:59           ` Waiman Long
2014-04-07 16:59             ` Waiman Long
2014-04-07 14:09         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 14:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 14:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 14:33         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-07 14:33           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-07 14:33         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-07 14:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-04 16:57     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] qspinlock, x86: Enable x86-64 to use queue spinlock Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] qspinlock: More optimized code for smaller NR_CPUS Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] qspinlock: Optimized code path for 2 contending tasks Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] pvqspinlock, x86: Allow unfair spinlock in a PV guest Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27   ` Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] pvqspinlock: Enable lock stealing in queue lock waiters Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] pvqspinlock, x86: Rename paravirt_ticketlocks_enabled Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] pvqspinlock, x86: Add qspinlock para-virtualization support Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable qspinlock PV support for KVM Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable qspinlock PV support for XEN Waiman Long
2014-04-02 13:27 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-02 14:39   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-02 14:39   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-02 20:38     ` Waiman Long [this message]
2014-04-02 20:38       ` Waiman Long
2014-04-02 14:32 ` [PATCH v8 00/10] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-02 14:32   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-02 20:35   ` Waiman Long
2014-04-03  2:10     ` Waiman Long
2014-04-03  2:10       ` Waiman Long
2014-04-03 17:23       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-03 17:23       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-03 17:23         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04  2:57         ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04  2:57           ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 16:55           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 16:55             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 16:55             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 16:55             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 17:13             ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 17:13             ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 17:13               ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 17:58               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 17:58               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 17:58                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 18:33                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 18:33                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 18:33                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 18:14             ` Marcos E. Matsunaga
2014-04-04 18:14             ` Marcos E. Matsunaga
2014-04-04 18:14             ` Marcos E. Matsunaga
2014-04-04 16:55           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04  2:57         ` Waiman Long
2014-04-03  2:10     ` Waiman Long
2014-04-02 20:35   ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 15:25   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 15:25     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 15:25   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-07  6:14 ` Raghavendra K T
2014-04-07  6:14 ` Raghavendra K T
2014-04-07  6:14 ` Raghavendra K T
2014-04-07 16:38   ` Waiman Long
2014-04-07 16:38   ` Waiman Long
2014-04-07 16:38     ` Waiman Long
2014-04-07 17:51     ` Raghavendra K T
2014-04-07 17:51     ` Raghavendra K T
2014-04-07 17:51       ` Raghavendra K T
2014-04-08 19:15       ` Waiman Long
2014-04-08 19:15       ` Waiman Long
2014-04-08 19:15         ` Waiman Long
2014-04-09 12:08         ` Raghavendra K T
2014-04-09 12:08         ` Raghavendra K T
2014-04-09 12:08         ` Raghavendra K T
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-04-01 20:47 Waiman Long
2014-04-01 20:47 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable qspinlock PV support for XEN Waiman Long
2014-04-01 20:47 ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=533C7557.60908@hp.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hp.com \
    --cc=aswin@hp.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paolo.bonzini@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.