From: antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com (Antoine Ténart)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: document the berlin enable-method property
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:14:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533D268E.7070502@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <533D21AF.2070508@free-electrons.com>
On 03/04/2014 10:54, Antoine T?nart wrote:
> Jisheng,
>
> On 03/04/2014 10:22, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 01:08:15 -0700
>> Antoine T?nart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Antoine T?nart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt index
>>> 333f4aea3029..a9e42a2dbc99 100644 ---
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt +++
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt @@ -185,6 +185,8 @@
>>> nodes
>>> to be present and contain the properties described below.
>>> "qcom,gcc-msm8660"
>>> "qcom,kpss-acc-v1"
>>> "qcom,kpss-acc-v2"
>>> + "marvell,88de31-smp" - cpu-core handling for
>>
>> why not "marvell,berlin-smp"?
>
> We have SMP on the BG2 and the BG2Q currently. Future boards may not be
> compatible with this method (BG3 ?), I think "marvell,berlin-smp" is too
> generic.
>
> We could use "marvell,88de31xx-smp" as Alexandre suggested.
"marvell,88de31xx-smp" is not a good choice too, since futur SoC may
match the "xx" and not use this method. A better way should be to use
the first SoC implementing the feature, so "marvell,88de3100".
Antoine
--
Antoine T?nart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Antoine Ténart" <antoine.tenart-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"alexandre.belloni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org"
<alexandre.belloni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Jimmy Xu <zmxu-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: document the berlin enable-method property
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:14:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533D268E.7070502@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <533D21AF.2070508-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
On 03/04/2014 10:54, Antoine Ténart wrote:
> Jisheng,
>
> On 03/04/2014 10:22, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 01:08:15 -0700
>> Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt index
>>> 333f4aea3029..a9e42a2dbc99 100644 ---
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt +++
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt @@ -185,6 +185,8 @@
>>> nodes
>>> to be present and contain the properties described below.
>>> "qcom,gcc-msm8660"
>>> "qcom,kpss-acc-v1"
>>> "qcom,kpss-acc-v2"
>>> + "marvell,88de31-smp" - cpu-core handling for
>>
>> why not "marvell,berlin-smp"?
>
> We have SMP on the BG2 and the BG2Q currently. Future boards may not be
> compatible with this method (BG3 ?), I think "marvell,berlin-smp" is too
> generic.
>
> We could use "marvell,88de31xx-smp" as Alexandre suggested.
"marvell,88de31xx-smp" is not a good choice too, since futur SoC may
match the "xx" and not use this method. A better way should be to use
the first SoC implementing the feature, so "marvell,88de3100".
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Antoine Ténart" <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
Cc: "sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com"
<sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
"alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com"
<alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
Jimmy Xu <zmxu@marvell.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: document the berlin enable-method property
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:14:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533D268E.7070502@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <533D21AF.2070508@free-electrons.com>
On 03/04/2014 10:54, Antoine Ténart wrote:
> Jisheng,
>
> On 03/04/2014 10:22, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 01:08:15 -0700
>> Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt index
>>> 333f4aea3029..a9e42a2dbc99 100644 ---
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt +++
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt @@ -185,6 +185,8 @@
>>> nodes
>>> to be present and contain the properties described below.
>>> "qcom,gcc-msm8660"
>>> "qcom,kpss-acc-v1"
>>> "qcom,kpss-acc-v2"
>>> + "marvell,88de31-smp" - cpu-core handling for
>>
>> why not "marvell,berlin-smp"?
>
> We have SMP on the BG2 and the BG2Q currently. Future boards may not be
> compatible with this method (BG3 ?), I think "marvell,berlin-smp" is too
> generic.
>
> We could use "marvell,88de31xx-smp" as Alexandre suggested.
"marvell,88de31xx-smp" is not a good choice too, since futur SoC may
match the "xx" and not use this method. A better way should be to use
the first SoC implementing the feature, so "marvell,88de3100".
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-03 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-03 8:08 [PATCH 0/3] ARM: berlin: convert smp to CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 8:08 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 8:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: berlin: use CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE for smp Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 8:08 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 8:08 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 8:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: document the berlin enable-method property Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 8:08 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 8:08 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 8:22 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-04-03 8:22 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-04-03 8:22 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-04-03 8:54 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 8:54 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 8:54 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 9:14 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-04-03 9:14 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-04-03 9:14 ` Antoine Ténart [this message]
2014-04-03 9:14 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 9:14 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 9:40 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-04-03 9:40 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-04-03 9:40 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-04-03 8:29 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-04-03 8:29 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-04-03 9:02 ` Mark Rutland
2014-04-03 9:02 ` Mark Rutland
2014-04-03 8:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: berlin: add enable-method property in cpus node for smp Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 8:08 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-03 8:08 ` Antoine Ténart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=533D268E.7070502@free-electrons.com \
--to=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.