From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from locke.effortlessis.com ([208.53.66.14]:53607 "EHLO locke.effortlessis.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753566AbaDDA0x (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2014 20:26:53 -0400 Received: from tesla.schoolpathways.com (173-166-236-97-sacramento.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.236.97]) by locke.effortlessis.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB11C44F9D for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 00:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <533DFC46.8020704@benjamindsmith.com> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:26:46 -0700 From: Lists MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Hard restart required Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Trying out BTRFS today for the first time after a few false starts with three drives configured raid1. I'm using Oracle Linux 6/64 with all updates applied on unremarkable hardware. (cast off Dell Core2 desktop, 2 GB RAM, no known problems) Here's what it looks like: [root@oracle ~]# btrfs filesystem show Label: none uuid: bdaf3d87-f992-4a89-9e2b-41de0b5ff909 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 448.82MB devid 2 size 1.36TB used 167.01GB path /dev/sdc devid 3 size 1.82TB used 167.01GB path /dev/sdd devid 1 size 931.51GB used 2.02GB path /dev/sdb It hard locked and required a power-off system restart. Is this atypical? Here's what did it, this should be OK? # mount -U bdaf3d87-f992-4a89-9e2b-41de0b5ff909 /media/btrfs; UUID should work, right? Why else have a UUID if not? Currently, I'm using below in /etc/fstab, but this is not preferred since I'm expecting hard disks to come and go in my eventual use case - I'm rather certain that /dev/sdc will not be the correct drive to mount at some point: /dev/sdc /backups/spfs btrfs noatime,subvol=spfs,compress 0 0 Thanks, -Ben