From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver-e7X0jjDqjFGHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] perf_event_open.2 : document PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC flag
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:17:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533E6A8D.3020408@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1404021116290.19485-6xBS8L8d439fDsnSvq7Uq4Se7xf15W0s1dQoKJhdanU@public.gmane.org>
On 04/02/2014 05:22 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>
>> I applied, and reworked the text to be:
>>
>> PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC (since Linux 3.14).
>> This flag enables the close-on-exec flag for the created
>> event file descriptor, so that the file descriptor is
>> automatically closed on execve(2). Setting the close-
>> on-exec flags at creation time, rather than later with
>> fcntl(2), avoids potential race conditions where the
>> calling thread invokes perf_event_open() at the same
>> time as another thread calls fork(2) then execve(2).
>>
>> Okay?
>
> I think the actual race condition being worried about is this:
>
>
> thread1 thread2
>
> fd=perf_event_open() |
> | fork()
> | exec()
> | |
> fcntl(CLOEXEC) |
> fd has escaped past exec because
> fcntl didn't happen fast enough
Yes, that's the one.
> so if you do a
>
> fd=perf_event_open(...,PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
>
> then fd is always CLOEXEC and you don't have a brief window of time
> before the fcntl() where the fd can escape.
>
>
> I'm not sure of a scuccint way to express that though.
I think the existing text suffices.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-04 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-01 21:36 [patch v2] perf_event_open.2 : document PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC flag Vince Weaver
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1404011734320.17339-6xBS8L8d439fDsnSvq7Uq4Se7xf15W0s1dQoKJhdanU@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-02 7:41 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
[not found] ` <533BBF1F.4070608-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-02 15:22 ` Vince Weaver
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1404021116290.19485-6xBS8L8d439fDsnSvq7Uq4Se7xf15W0s1dQoKJhdanU@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-04 8:17 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
[not found] ` <533E6A8D.3020408-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-07 5:02 ` Vince Weaver
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1404070059480.16856-6xBS8L8d439fDsnSvq7Uq4Se7xf15W0s1dQoKJhdanU@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-10 19:56 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=533E6A8D.3020408@gmail.com \
--to=mtk.manpages-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver-e7X0jjDqjFGHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.