From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ranch Subject: Re: AX25 Node problem - please help Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 14:31:29 -0700 Message-ID: <5341C7B1.2030503@trinnet.net> References: <53412F05.4090306@mybunker.plus.com> <53419279.3090804@mybunker.plus.com> <5341ADD0.2050303@trinnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org > Okay, what's the logic in that? If UroNode fixes a lot of the problems > in the original "node" package, why package it up in the distributions > where it will get wider visibility and coverage? I'll admit I hadn't > even heard of it until Brian Rogers mentioned it in an earlier thread, > with a link to it on an obscure FTP site. I had an email thread with Brian many months ago where he previously had some personal objections of how some distributions compiled things incorrectly, created specific support issues, etc. I think previous versions of UroNode called out those objections in the LICENSE file but it seems both 2.0 and 2.1 have that file removed in their respective archive: ftp://ftp.n1uro.net/packet/ It might be work asking him again as his UroNode software really is a significant improvement over the old LinuxNode package. --David KI6ZHD