From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <534275AD.50005@xenomai.org> Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 11:53:49 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1396407588.27578.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <533BBB11.5090808@xenomai.org> <1396848843.2481.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1396848843.2481.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] OMAP L138 List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Howard Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On 04/07/2014 07:34 AM, Peter Howard wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 09:24 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> On 04/02/2014 04:59 AM, Peter Howard wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm interested in running xenomai on a TI-OMAP L138 board. I found the >>> following thread in the archives: >>> >>> http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2010-January/018898.html >>> >>> where someone was working on porting ipipe and xenomai to that board. >>> However, the thread ended with problems still unresolved, and the patch >>> in the thread (just the changes for ipipe) isn't in the ipipe >>> repository. >>> >>> Does anyone know if this work was completed or just faded into the >>> ether? >> >> We never merged a patch for this processor. And a lot of things changed >> since that time. If you are interested in porting the I-pipe patch to >> this processor, see: >> >> http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/I-pipe-core:ArmPorting >> > > Contrary to what I said last week, I'm working on a patch off the head > of the ipipe repo. I have built a kernel with an ipipe port and with > xenomai patched in. However the latency results are bad right now: Well, in that case enable the I-pipe tracer, and run latency with the -f option to know why. -- Gilles.