From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2014, #01; Fri, 4) Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 20:35:00 +0200 Message-ID: <5342EFD4.6020007@kdbg.org> References: <533FCA92.8060006@kdbg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41jIER1eQ==?= , Stefan Zager , =?UTF-8?B?VG9ycw==?= =?UTF-8?B?dGVuIELDtmdlcnNoYXVzZW4=?= To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 07 20:35:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WXEO3-0005eO-ND for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 20:35:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755561AbaDGSfI (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:35:08 -0400 Received: from bsmtp3.bon.at ([213.33.87.17]:35503 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755161AbaDGSfH (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:35:07 -0400 Received: from dx.sixt.local (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8AECDF8E; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 20:35:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dx.sixt.local (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.sixt.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5E019F40F; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 20:35:01 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 In-Reply-To: <533FCA92.8060006@kdbg.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 05.04.2014 11:19, schrieb Johannes Sixt: > Am 04.04.2014 22:58, schrieb Junio C Hamano: >> * sz/mingw-index-pack-threaded (2014-03-19) 1 commit >> - Enable index-pack threading in msysgit. >> >> What is the status of this topic? A failure report exists >> ($gmane/245170), and I am aware of Duy's $gmane/245034 but that was >> where the discussion stalled. Is everybody waiting for everybody >> else to get the discussion unstuck? > > I still have to cross-check Duy's patch. I'll hopefully get to it in the > next days and report back. The test suite passes with Duy's patch ($gmane/245034), but t5302 fails with this patch with a MinGW build. The patches touch the Cygwin configuration, but I cannot test a Cygwin build. I have, however, lost track of what the objective of these patches is. Is the threaded version significantly faster, and these patches are worth it? -- Hannes