All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Adding interrupt support to gpio-ich driver (possibly via SCI)
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 20:21:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53436B1C.8010102@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140408024851.GA3594@srcf.ucam.org>

On 04/07/2014 07:48 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 09:25:50AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
>> Is there a clean way to use any of those to implement interrupt support
>> for this driver ? I thought about hijacking the SCI interrupt by registering
>> an interrupt handler with acpi_install_sci_handler(), but that would restrict
>> the driver to kernel only (or the acpi function would have to be exported),
>> and I have no idea if it would work or, more importantly, if it would be
>> the best approach to solve the problem, or if the result would be acceptable.
>> I can figure out the "working" part, but that would not help much if I would
>> have to carry the patch locally because it is not acceptable for upstream
>> integration.
>
> You shouldn't need to install an SCI handler - the way the hardware will
> generate an SCI is to raise a GPE. If you know which GPE the device
> raises (my recollection is that for most Intel chipsets it's GPIO number
> + 0x10) then you can just call acpi_install_gpe_handler(). The problem

Sounds good. Do you by any chance have a pointer to some documentation
explaining this in some more detail ?

> is that the firmware may well already be using some of those GPIOs, and
> there's no easy way to tell. Checking the interrupt configuration isn't
> sufficient, since some of them may just be used as outputs.
>
The gpio-ich driver already has some magic to detect that condition - I
noticed that I can not request all GPIO pins on all hardware. Either case,
the gpio pins I am interested in are well defined on the hardware I am
dealing with, so I can be sure I won't step on some unexpected use.

Thanks!

Guenter


  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-08  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-04 16:25 Adding interrupt support to gpio-ich driver (possibly via SCI) Guenter Roeck
2014-04-08  2:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-04-08  3:21   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-04-08  3:31     ` Matthew Garrett
2014-04-08  4:02       ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53436B1C.8010102@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=ptyser@xes-inc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.