From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hujianyang Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Fix the comment of sd_major Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:24:16 +0800 Message-ID: <53438800.6040801@huawei.com> References: <534385F5.9070606@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:59442 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750994AbaDHFY1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2014 01:24:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <534385F5.9070606@huawei.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 2014/4/8 13:15, hujianyang wrote: > Fix the comment of sd_major to right major numbers. > > Signed-off-by: root > > --- > drivers/scsi/sd.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c > index 470954a..02ff975 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c > @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ static struct kobject *sd_default_probe(dev_t devt, int *partno, void *data) > * ones with major1, ... Disk 256 is for major0 again, disk 272 > * for major1, ... > * As we stay compatible with our numbering scheme, we can reuse > - * the well-know SCSI majors 8, 65--71, 136--143. > + * the well-know SCSI majors 8, 65--71, 128--135. > */ > static int sd_major(int major_idx) > { > Forgot to change the signed-off part. Sorry for that. I will send a new patch.