From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:02:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.156.133.130] ([217.156.133.130]:12494 "EHLO imgpgp01.kl.imgtec.org" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6821191AbaDIJCFJs7lc (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:02:05 +0200 Received: from imgpgp01.kl.imgtec.org (imgpgp01.kl.imgtec.org [127.0.0.1]) by imgpgp01.kl.imgtec.org (PGP Universal) with ESMTP id ED6B741F8E1F; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:01:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([10.100.180.241]) by imgpgp01.kl.imgtec.org (PGP Universal service); Wed, 09 Apr 2014 10:01:58 +0100 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by imgpgp01.kl.imgtec.org on Wed, 09 Apr 2014 10:01:58 +0100 Received: from KLMAIL01.kl.imgtec.org (unknown [192.168.5.35]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id ED67732ADC4C0; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:01:56 +0100 (IST) Received: from LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org (192.168.152.62) by KLMAIL01.kl.imgtec.org (192.168.5.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:01:58 +0100 Received: from [192.168.154.65] (192.168.154.65) by LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org (192.168.152.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:01:58 +0100 Message-ID: <53450C85.3030204@imgtec.com> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:01:57 +0100 From: James Hogan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Markos Chandras CC: Paul Bolle , Ralf Baechle , Subject: Re: MIPS: Remove last traces of SMTC Support too? References: <1397033309.22767.8.camel@x220> <53450BBE.7050501@imgtec.com> In-Reply-To: <53450BBE.7050501@imgtec.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ET46Kath3jK405kQlOgXpMagF6sx7rlvv" X-Originating-IP: [192.168.154.65] X-ESG-ENCRYPT-TAG: 86d0bfe3 Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 39739 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: james.hogan@imgtec.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips --ET46Kath3jK405kQlOgXpMagF6sx7rlvv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/04/14 09:58, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 04/09/2014 09:48 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: >> The patch "MIPS: Remove SMTC Support" landed in linux-next (see >> next-20140409). A quick grep of the tree suggests a follow up is neede= d >> (a sort-of-patch is pasted below). >> >> Is a similar follow up queued somewhere? If not, should I submit a pat= ch >> or should I wait with doing that until "MIPS: Remove SMTC Support" hit= s >> mainline? >> >> >> Paul Bolle >=20 > Hi Paul, >=20 > I talked to Ralf yesterday. It seems the patch was not applied correctl= y > and there are a few traces left. My original patch definitely removes > the traces listed in your patch. >=20 > You can compare the original patch >=20 > https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/6719/ >=20 > with the one currently present in upstream-sfr/mips-for-linux-next bran= ch >=20 Note that the cpu-info.h part of Paul's suggested patch is new, due to code added in b86c2247a20f (MIPS: Add cpu_vpe_id macro). Cheers James --ET46Kath3jK405kQlOgXpMagF6sx7rlvv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTRQyGAAoJEGwLaZPeOHZ6Q1wP/1SJ/gtluajsl17dPrJZJkOL oESoNsC/EkBC+YGjcQ63VyqgrLUaAu4iv3rA7V1+puEi2GrD7ok0Q2d4gL35W2Q2 ZbpTeIQrLqDIc5Mz+A22jqoYZQQGqGp6wD9dO3JtGGvWVrPKx4HtT+8jqBTNe7fO 2AxznqRwUpOxsgY9AQV2Jd8+KG6TbMr8WcBqOK9+ZedJezHMP43MZ/ZPGlIGYpcT o9WLEn8pCG/QKxZU1eiehrtiEtebNfkju8dk7hSUwueUyDXv44OndheYCLPHxzLO 1OxLGeMbruev430vhhOyXiqviETpsLFcgSXkkfKn0KwA0ccY3JvBYqaqx/85J8Lj P7579mOcOT9FK+Crh1EoJpUa1sg7B2OpAT7MKdjlP2I/XyaTggrvyzlep4VCJuRi 66q7LA/p6CBpAPk5mSFQielDHZNuEGU/gn7j5bJTnoPx7TFuf3jdrWxRmr6EqHlM HVsmOcyXPfli0BAm421PUyXsIlWYKOBX1Lm0JFLWCbGIb+mNogRYQ+V9t2Y5W50N GUlsgybe7UALWXS1zgn2JMatIJxXiCqPJRytLNzAuIE3XmLB2rxwn2WO+xGU+aUr dMAbL1VRLdRQDb+zKWIQQrAlNM4XdH1vX+xCOtHx9SL30YW7iGFO0yTZLC6yptSf UXUDO4d8K7QJ0kg8PwIw =SpBs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ET46Kath3jK405kQlOgXpMagF6sx7rlvv-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [217.156.133.130] ([217.156.133.130]:12494 "EHLO imgpgp01.kl.imgtec.org" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6821191AbaDIJCFJs7lc (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:02:05 +0200 Message-ID: <53450C85.3030204@imgtec.com> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:01:57 +0100 From: James Hogan MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: MIPS: Remove last traces of SMTC Support too? References: <1397033309.22767.8.camel@x220> <53450BBE.7050501@imgtec.com> In-Reply-To: <53450BBE.7050501@imgtec.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ET46Kath3jK405kQlOgXpMagF6sx7rlvv" Return-Path: Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: To: Markos Chandras Cc: Paul Bolle , Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Message-ID: <20140409090157.bdTf4updiV_ILiiyRNSNnM4tmzKH4FbFGFiwctW5FeQ@z> --ET46Kath3jK405kQlOgXpMagF6sx7rlvv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/04/14 09:58, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 04/09/2014 09:48 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: >> The patch "MIPS: Remove SMTC Support" landed in linux-next (see >> next-20140409). A quick grep of the tree suggests a follow up is neede= d >> (a sort-of-patch is pasted below). >> >> Is a similar follow up queued somewhere? If not, should I submit a pat= ch >> or should I wait with doing that until "MIPS: Remove SMTC Support" hit= s >> mainline? >> >> >> Paul Bolle >=20 > Hi Paul, >=20 > I talked to Ralf yesterday. It seems the patch was not applied correctl= y > and there are a few traces left. My original patch definitely removes > the traces listed in your patch. >=20 > You can compare the original patch >=20 > https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/6719/ >=20 > with the one currently present in upstream-sfr/mips-for-linux-next bran= ch >=20 Note that the cpu-info.h part of Paul's suggested patch is new, due to code added in b86c2247a20f (MIPS: Add cpu_vpe_id macro). Cheers James --ET46Kath3jK405kQlOgXpMagF6sx7rlvv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTRQyGAAoJEGwLaZPeOHZ6Q1wP/1SJ/gtluajsl17dPrJZJkOL oESoNsC/EkBC+YGjcQ63VyqgrLUaAu4iv3rA7V1+puEi2GrD7ok0Q2d4gL35W2Q2 ZbpTeIQrLqDIc5Mz+A22jqoYZQQGqGp6wD9dO3JtGGvWVrPKx4HtT+8jqBTNe7fO 2AxznqRwUpOxsgY9AQV2Jd8+KG6TbMr8WcBqOK9+ZedJezHMP43MZ/ZPGlIGYpcT o9WLEn8pCG/QKxZU1eiehrtiEtebNfkju8dk7hSUwueUyDXv44OndheYCLPHxzLO 1OxLGeMbruev430vhhOyXiqviETpsLFcgSXkkfKn0KwA0ccY3JvBYqaqx/85J8Lj P7579mOcOT9FK+Crh1EoJpUa1sg7B2OpAT7MKdjlP2I/XyaTggrvyzlep4VCJuRi 66q7LA/p6CBpAPk5mSFQielDHZNuEGU/gn7j5bJTnoPx7TFuf3jdrWxRmr6EqHlM HVsmOcyXPfli0BAm421PUyXsIlWYKOBX1Lm0JFLWCbGIb+mNogRYQ+V9t2Y5W50N GUlsgybe7UALWXS1zgn2JMatIJxXiCqPJRytLNzAuIE3XmLB2rxwn2WO+xGU+aUr dMAbL1VRLdRQDb+zKWIQQrAlNM4XdH1vX+xCOtHx9SL30YW7iGFO0yTZLC6yptSf UXUDO4d8K7QJ0kg8PwIw =SpBs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ET46Kath3jK405kQlOgXpMagF6sx7rlvv--