From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-gw2-out.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.63]:39168 "EHLO mail-gw2-out.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758317AbaDIK7q (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 06:59:46 -0400 Message-ID: <53452817.5060502@broadcom.com> (sfid-20140409_125948_482296_E2FE4840) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 12:59:35 +0200 From: Arend van Spriel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , "backports@vger.kernel.org" CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , Jiri Slaby , Felix Fietkau , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: Bumping required kernels to 3.0 for Linux backports ? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Sender: backports-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/04/14 03:03, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Folks, > [...] > To start off -- what's the *last* kernel you realistically need for > your users to use backports right now? Is it really 2.6.25? Would > anyone kick and scream if for the backports-3.15 release try take > things up to support only down to least 3.0 *right now* ? A lot of test teams in broadcom wlan are still using Fedora 15 running a 2.6.38 kernel. We are pushing them to move to Fedora 19. Regards, Arend > [0] http://www.do-not-panic.com/2014/04/automatic-linux-kernel-backporting-with-coccinelle.html > > Luis > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >