From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx-3.enea.com (sestofw01.enea.se [192.36.1.252]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CE75E00B88 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 04:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.enea.se (192.168.14.171) by smtp.enea.com (172.21.1.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:05:41 +0200 Message-ID: <53452985.7020202@enea.com> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:05:41 +0300 From: Vali Cobelea Organization: ENEA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Eggleton References: <534416F0.10109@enea.com> <9507315.eLP4En45Q5@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> <53452733.2070806@enea.com> <33266524.grSQoK8z6t@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <33266524.grSQoK8z6t@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> X-Originating-IP: [192.168.14.171] Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Alexandru Vaduva Subject: Re: CGL compliance layer initiative X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:05:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OK Paul, that indeed makes sense, I really did not knew that preliminary versions of layers are accepted. I will discuss around here and if everything goes OK we will start the move in the "public" layer index. I also do agree with an all-together strategy, no matter for the layer state. Much appreciated, Vali On 04/09/2014 02:01 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wednesday 09 April 2014 13:55:47 Vali Cobelea wrote: >> On 04/09/2014 01:51 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> On Tuesday 08 April 2014 18:34:08 Vali Cobelea wrote: >>>> Here at ENEA we decided to take the initiative regarding the CGL >>>> compliance when it comes to the Yocto Project. >>>> For this we started the work on a dedicated layer called 'meta-cgl' >>>> >>>> which can be accessed / cloned from here: >>>> http://git.enea.com/git/?p=linux/meta-cgl.git >>>> git clone git@git.enea.com:linux/meta-cgl >>>> >>>> Have a look of the things we got there so far, please remember that >>>> there is still plenty of work to be done (layer architecture, CGL >>>> requirements coverage mode and so on). >>>> It is a little bit more than a stub layer, consider it a starting point >>>> for the direction we would like to have with this layer. >>>> >>>> Any input is much appreciated, lets keep the discussion by this email >>>> thread and see where it goes. >>> I don't have anything to offer on the layer contents, but I would say in >>> order to make it easy for people to find this layer I would strongly >>> encourage you to> >>> submit it to the OpenEmbedded layer index: >>> http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/submit/ >> Thank you for the input. >> We will keep the layer for a short period of time at the current >> location while getting other ideas regarding the content / architecture. >> The layer initiative will also be raised up in the board advisory >> meeting, in order to get even more input. >> After which we will make it easier to find, access and use for anyone, >> exactly as you suggested. > OK, as the maintainer it's totally up to you. > > I would say though generally that I'd like to see more people adding their > work-in-progress layers to the layer index, even if at some time later they > will be moved elsewhere or absorbed into another layer - it just makes it > easier to point people to the layer index so they can find recipes that have > already been written, rather than having to re-write them from scratch. > > Cheers, > Paul >