From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/xen: Fix 32-bit PV guests's usage of kernel_stack
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 12:15:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53457234.4090203@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140409112517.570b24e9@gandalf.local.home>
On 04/09/2014 11:25 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:12:33 -0400
> Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> Commit 198d208df4371734ac4728f69cb585c284d20a15 made 32-bit kernels use
>> kernel_stack to point to thread_info. That change missed a couple of
>> updates needed by Xen's PV guests:
>>
>> 1. kernel_stack needs to be initialized for secondary CPUs
>> 2. GET_THREAD_INFO() now uses %fs register which may not be the kernel's
>> version when executing xen_iret()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 3 ++-
>> arch/x86/xen/xen-asm_32.S | 4 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> index a18eadd..7005974 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> @@ -441,10 +441,11 @@ static int xen_cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>> irq_ctx_init(cpu);
>> #else
>> clear_tsk_thread_flag(idle, TIF_FORK);
>> +#endif
>> per_cpu(kernel_stack, cpu) =
>> (unsigned long)task_stack_page(idle) -
>> KERNEL_STACK_OFFSET + THREAD_SIZE;
>> -#endif
>> +
>> xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);
>> xen_setup_timer(cpu);
>> xen_init_lock_cpu(cpu);
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/xen-asm_32.S b/arch/x86/xen/xen-asm_32.S
>> index 33ca6e4..d433637 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/xen-asm_32.S
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/xen-asm_32.S
>> @@ -88,7 +88,11 @@ ENTRY(xen_iret)
>> * avoid having to reload %fs
> Looks like this patch makes the above comment incorrect.
I didn't notice this (it was full 3 lines above the change), it will
obviously have to be updated.
>> */
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> + pushw %fs
>> + movl $(__KERNEL_PERCPU), %eax
>> + movl %eax, %fs
>> GET_THREAD_INFO(%eax)
>> + popw %fs
>> movl %ss:TI_cpu(%eax), %eax
> Hmm, you're using GET_THREAD_INFO() to get the thread info to find the
> current CPU for later use to avoid using %fs. ??
>
> Is it possible to just push the cpu on the kernel irq stack and be able
> to retrieve it manually? Looks like the only reason to use the
> thread_info here is to get to the CPU index for below.
Or vcpu_info, which is what we are really after.
However, it looks like using %fs/GET_THREAD_INFO() should be OK as well,
provided I deal with a potential faulting.
-boris
>
>> movl %ss:__per_cpu_offset(,%eax,4), %eax
>> mov %ss:xen_vcpu(%eax), %eax
> -- Steve
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-09 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-09 14:06 [PATCH] x86/xen: Fix 32-bit PV guests's usage of kernel_stack Boris Ostrovsky
2014-04-09 14:08 ` David Vrabel
2014-04-09 14:08 ` David Vrabel
2014-04-09 14:21 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2014-04-09 14:29 ` David Vrabel
2014-04-09 14:29 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-04-09 14:41 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-04-09 14:41 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper
2014-04-09 15:01 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-09 15:01 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2014-04-09 15:38 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-04-09 15:40 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-09 15:40 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2014-04-09 15:38 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-04-09 14:21 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-09 15:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-09 15:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-09 16:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2014-04-09 16:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-04-09 14:06 Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53457234.4090203@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.