From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce per-vm kvm device attributes
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:37:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53468292.5080200@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397128604-50161-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
On 10.04.14 13:16, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Marcelo, Gleb, Alex,
>
> this is a followup to the recent discussion (re config device)
>
> To avoid a bunch of new ioctl, lets reuse the device attributes on
> the "VM device". All of these attributes are architecture specific.
> Patch1 introduces the interface,
> Patch2 makes CMMA configurable
> Patch3 uses the interface introduced in patch1
>
> Marcelo, Gleb, Alex, are you ok with the approach of patch 1? Then we
> will continue using that for VM specific controls instead of adding
> new ioctls. (Otherwise we will continue with new ioctl).
Looks reasonable to me, though I wouldn't be opposed to ENABLE_CAP +
specific ioctl for reset in this case either. Whatever works better for
you guys.
Acked-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Alex
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-10 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-10 11:16 [PATCH 0/3] Introduce per-vm kvm device attributes Christian Borntraeger
2014-04-10 11:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] kvm: s390: Per-vm kvm device controls Christian Borntraeger
2014-04-10 11:29 ` Alexander Graf
2014-04-10 11:33 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-04-10 11:35 ` Alexander Graf
2014-04-10 11:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] kvm: s390: make cmma usage conditionally Christian Borntraeger
2014-04-10 11:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] kvm: s390: Exploiting generic userspace interface for cmma Christian Borntraeger
2014-04-16 18:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] kvm: s390: Exploiting generic userspace interface for cmma\ Marcelo Tosatti
2014-04-16 19:47 ` Alexander Graf
2014-04-21 20:48 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-04-10 11:37 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53468292.5080200@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.