From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172] helo=ns3.lanforge.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WYFEd-0003oo-DZ for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:41:44 +0000 Received: from [50.54.140.2] (50-54-140-2.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net [50.54.140.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns3.lanforge.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s3ADfFXH023333 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 06:41:15 -0700 Message-ID: <53469F7B.2080202@candelatech.com> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 06:41:15 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Question on ath10k_mgmt_tx_flush List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Can we optimize this method to return early if the tx-credits are fully replenished (ie, == 2) instead of just sleeping the 2 x beacon-interval? That would indicate all messages have been flushed, right? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k